BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Test 52 : Mud and chemical

Expert replies
by SmarpanGamt » Fri Oct 22, 2010 12:46 am
Mud from a lake on an uninhabited wooded island in northern Lake Superior contains toxic chemicals, including toxaphene, a banned pesticide for cotton that previously was manufactured and used, not in nearby regions of Canada or the northern United States, but in the southern United States. No dumping has occurred on the island. The island lake is sufficiently elevated that water from Lake Superior does not reach it.

The statements above, if true, most strongly support which of the following hypothesis?

(A) The waters of the island lake are more severely polluted than those of Lake Superior.
(B) The toxaphene was carried to the island in the atmosphere by winds.
(C) Banning chemicals such as toxaphene does not aid the natural environment.
(D) Toxaphene has adverse effects on human beings but not on other organisms.
(E) Concentrations of toxaphene in the soil of cotton-growing regions are not sufficient to be measurable.

Please explain your pick I was confused with A and B Please explain according to Powerscore SC "most strongly support question suggest must be true question, therefore any external information is not encouraged.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by shovan85 » Fri Oct 22, 2010 4:48 am
Between A and B, A does not help to explain the presence of Toxaphene in Lake Superior.
There are several Questions we can raise against A.
If all lakes are more polluted than Superior how does it affect Superior? Superior at higher level so water cannot flow into that from other lakes.
Other lakes are polluted but where has it been said those pollutants are Toxaphene?

Whereas B clearly says Toxaphene has been carried by wind up to Superior lake level. And in premise also it has been said the toxic chemical is found in Superior lake bottom.

We can easily discard C,D and E.

IMO B
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion

by SmarpanGamt » Fri Oct 22, 2010 9:30 pm
@shovan85

Thanks Got your point ! good explaination

But Can you help to explain what is the difference between " Most Strongly Support " and "Must be true" question.

Thanks
Join the discussion

by shovan85 » Fri Oct 22, 2010 10:24 pm
SmarpanGamt wrote:@shovan85

Thanks Got your point ! good explaination

But Can you help to explain what is the difference between " Most Strongly Support " and "Must be true" question.

Thanks
Yes, Ron gave a nice example of this in RC workshop.

"Ron went to a restaurant 20 times last month. He ate chicken 19 times there by paying 30$ a plate".

What is the Must be true Answer:
A-Ron loves chicken
B-Ron ate something else in the Restaurant

If you think its A then you are wrong. Its B. He has eaten 20 times, 19 times chicken but what about 20-19 = 1 time he MUST have eaten but NOT chicken. So he ate something else.

Must be true mean 100% it can be proved from the premises.
Most strongly supports means 99.99% it can be proved just a little outside info is allowed.
If the problem is Easy Respect it, if the problem is tough Attack it
Join the discussion