BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

test 29

Expert replies
by vaivish » Wed Sep 17, 2008 7:43 am
Dietary researcher: A recent study reports that laboratory animals that were fed reduced-calorie diets lived longer than laboratory animals whose caloric intake was not reduced. In response, some doctors are advocating reduced-calorie diets, in the belief that North Americans’ life spans can thereby be extended. However, this conclusion is not supported. Laboratory animals tend to eat much more than animals in their natural habitats, which leads to their having a shorter life expectancy. Restricting their diets merely brings their caloric intake back to natural optimal levels and reinstates their normal life spans.
Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the dietary researcher’s argument?
(A) North Americans, on average, consume a higher number of calories than the optimal number of calories for a human diet.
(B) North Americans with high-fat, low-calorie diets generally have a shorter life expectancy than North Americans with low-fat, low-calorie diets.
(C) Not all scientific results that have important implications for human health are based on studies of laboratory animals.
(D) Some North Americans who follow reduced-calorie diets are long-lived.
(E) There is a strong correlation between diet and longevity in some species of animals.


OA is a.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by amitabhprasad » Thu Sep 18, 2008 7:22 pm
I will go with "A"
Here is my explanation,
Researcher assumption is animal in natural habitat eat proper diet. If any thing that can undermine this assumption will result in weakening author assumption.
Join the discussion

by stop@800 » Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:59 am
Ans is A

As per question, It is true that low (or in fact normal) calorie diet is needed for long life.


North American take high no of calories than human
so they have shorter life span

B: talks about fat
C: Not all results are based again out of context
D: Some long lived does not mean all will
E: We are talking about correlation between calorie and longevity
Join the discussion

by NSNguyen » Sat Sep 27, 2008 10:29 pm
A) North Americans, on average, consume a higher number of calories than the optimal number of calories for a human diet.
A reveals that when americans eats this kind of food, they come back to normal of calory intake. that why they still live in short life expectancy

(B) North Americans with high-fat, low-calorie diets generally have a shorter life expectancy than North Americans with low-fat, low-calorie diets. - > Out of scope

(C) Not all scientific results that have important implications for human health are based on studies of laboratory animals.
Irrelevant
(D) Some North Americans who follow reduced-calorie diets are long-lived. (strengthen, however using some, do not represent for all)
(E) There is a strong correlation between diet and longevity in some species of animals. ( strenthen)
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion

by peter.p.81 » Wed May 11, 2016 2:52 am
Cannot decide between A and B. Can anyone brake down these two choices for me please
Join the discussion