BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Teruvia

Expert replies
by sam2304 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:06 am
In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy domestic demand. Teruvia's total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably. Teruvia's population, however, will be increasing significantly for years to come. Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon have to begin importing rice.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in Teruvia.
B. Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the cultivation of rice.
C. None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.
D. There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not increase.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

[spoiler]What is wrong with E ? Can someone explain ?[/spoiler]
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by killer1387 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 4:30 am
sam2304 wrote:In Teruvia, the quantity of rice produced per year is currently just large enough to satisfy domestic demand. Teruvia's total rice acreage will not be expanded in the foreseeable future, nor will rice yields per acre increase appreciably. Teruvia's population, however, will be increasing significantly for years to come. Clearly, therefore, Teruvia will soon have to begin importing rice.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. No pronounced trend of decreasing per capita demand for rice is imminent in Teruvia.
B. Not all of the acreage in Teruvia currently planted with rice is well suited to the cultivation of rice.
C. None of the strains of rice grown in Teruvia are exceptionally high-yielding.
D. There are no populated regions in Teruvia in which the population will not increase.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

[spoiler]What is wrong with E ? Can someone explain ?[/spoiler]
IMO A
E is irrelevant to this argument. Argument is talking of rice and making conclusion that import of rice will begin. To make the conclusion A stands the proper assumption as if demand goes down then conclusion goes apart. E is talking about crops other than rice and hence is of no affect for the conclusion made in the passage.
Join the discussion

by sam2304 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 5:28 am
killer1387 wrote: E is irrelevant to this argument. Argument is talking of rice and making conclusion that import of rice will begin. To make the conclusion A stands the proper assumption as if demand goes down then conclusion goes apart. E is talking about crops other than rice and hence is of no affect for the conclusion made in the passage.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

Negation of E => There are some other major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia. - If this is true and there are other MAJOR crops to rely on, then Teruvia doesn't need to import rice. Thus, the argument falls apart. Hope I am not making any mistake in this.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Join the discussion

by killer1387 » Wed Mar 07, 2012 7:02 am
sam2304 wrote:
killer1387 wrote: E is irrelevant to this argument. Argument is talking of rice and making conclusion that import of rice will begin. To make the conclusion A stands the proper assumption as if demand goes down then conclusion goes apart. E is talking about crops other than rice and hence is of no affect for the conclusion made in the passage.
E. There are no major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia.

Negation of E => There are some other major crops other than rice for which domestic production and domestic demand are currently in balance in Teruvia. - If this is true and there are other MAJOR crops to rely on, then Teruvia doesn't need to import rice. Thus, the argument falls apart. Hope I am not making any mistake in this.
conclusion: Teruvia will soon have to begin importing rice.

the bold part in your opinion is not necessary.

they have other crops to rely on but this doesnt makes anything regarding import of rice less probable. Argument solely targets the import of rice. If there are other crops then why would they consider going for that crop rather than rice. How are we going to assume that much that they will divert to other crops letting the issue of rice go. Something should be in the argument to lead us to this thought. Hence E is just irrelevant to the conclusion. OTHER MAJOR CROPS might be having there own story but its simply independent to the import of rice.

hope this clarifies.
Join the discussion

by GmatKiss » Wed Mar 07, 2012 10:47 am
IMO: A - Bang on!

E - Out of context
Join the discussion