BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Terry and Pat

Expert replies
by harsh.champ » Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:24 am
Terry and Pat collected cans for recycling. What was the ratio of the number of carts Terry collected to the number of cans Pat collected?


(1) Pat collected 50 percent of the cans that they collected.
(2) Terry collected 140 cans.
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)



Just because something is hard doesn't mean you shouldn't try,it means you should just try harder.

"Keep Walking" - Johnny Walker :P
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by ajith » Wed Feb 17, 2010 7:03 am
harsh.champ wrote:Terry and Pat collected cans for recycling. What was the ratio of the number of carts Terry collected to the number of cans Pat collected?


(1) Pat collected 50 percent of the cans that they collected.
(2) Terry collected 140 cans.
1) is sufficient to conclude that ratio is 1:1

2) Insufficient

A
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by money9111 » Wed Feb 17, 2010 8:12 am
A because the equation is T/P and we know that pat collected 50%... so then terry collected the other 50%... 1:1
My goal is to make MBA applicants take onus over their process.

My story from Pre-MBA to Cornell MBA - New Post in Pre-MBA blog

Me featured on Poets & Quants

Free Book for MBA Applicants

Join the discussion

by outreach » Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:37 am
is carts and can same???

i am assumin this Q only has cans(to be collected by Terry and Pat)

1.
x- total number of cans collected by Terry and Pat
Pat collected 50 percent=0.5x
therefore pat has = x - cans held by Pat(0.5x)=0.5x

total ratio= cans held by Terry/ cans held by Pat=0.5x/0.5x=1

hence sufficient

2.
we do not know how many cans Pat collected
Join the discussion

by shashank.ism » Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:33 pm
harsh.champ wrote:Terry and Pat collected cans for recycling. What was the ratio of the number of carts Terry collected to the number of cans Pat collected?


(1) Pat collected 50 percent of the cans that they collected.
(2) Terry collected 140 cans.
St.1: Pat collected 50% so obviously Terry collected another 50% so their ratio = 1:1 -------------sufficient
St.2: Terry collected 140 cans. we know nothing about Pat. --------------insufficient

So, Ans A
My Websites:
www.mba.webmaggu.com - India's social Network for MBA Aspirants

www.deal.webmaggu.com -India's online discount, coupon, free stuff informer.

www.dictionary.webmaggu.com - A compact free online dictionary with images.

Nothing is Impossible, even Impossible says I'm possible.
Join the discussion