I am most irritared by the explanations of PR
This book does not set up an equation for me or anything like that! it will simply say "backsolve" or "ballpark"
BALLPARK?? what a joke is that? Honestly, stick to OG, Kaplan and Manhattan!
I just completed a test and I have no idea how to solve some of the problems I answered incorrectly!
Terrible PR explanations
This topic has expert replies
-
- Community Manager
- Posts: 363
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 12:24 pm
- Location: St. Louis
- Thanked: 7 times
- Followed by:3 members
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:26 am
- Followed by:3 members
Yeah, I agree. Even though the book does an ok job going through the basics (for those who forgot), I didn't like PRs strategy on solving math problems. It does come in handy in certain situations, but its always good to know the basics behind it.
I took a couple Manhattan GMAT CAT exams online and its a bit harder than PR and it explains the answers very nicely.
I took a couple Manhattan GMAT CAT exams online and its a bit harder than PR and it explains the answers very nicely.