BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Terra-cotta Warriors

Expert replies
by Dean Jones » Wed Nov 30, 2011 7:11 am
Dear Friends,

I was having problems in answering the following question.

Rivaling the pyramids of Egypt or even the ancient cities of the Maya as an
achievement, the army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang,
China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000
artisans more than 36 years to complete them
.

A. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete them
B. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete it
C. took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete
D. 700,000 artisans took more than 36 years to complete
E. to complete them too 700,000 artisans more than 36 years


Please help.

OA after some discussions.

My choice was option D

Regards
Deano.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by sumgb » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:35 am
IMO C

here's why....
"rivaliing .... achievement" is modifying "the army of..."
part of sentence to really focus starts from "the army of..."

here, ||ilsm comes into picture..

the army of... created .... and took ..... {eliminate option D and E}

for the remaining answer choices, everything boils down to pronoun and you really dont need one here.

"the army of... created .... and took .....to complete." is a complete sentence and you dont need a pronoun "it" [them is clearly incorrect as army is singular]

hrnce IMO
C
Join the discussion

by shankar.ashwin » Wed Nov 30, 2011 10:39 am
the army of terra-cotta warriors <created ----> is more than 2,000 years old and took 700,000 artisans more than 36 years to complete

Both sides of 'and' should be parallel and only C is. You dont need to mention the pronoun again here.
Join the discussion

by GmatVerbal » Wed Nov 30, 2011 11:17 am
the problem with choice (D) is - it has two clauses connected by 'and'.

1. 700,000 artisans took more than 36 years to complete (what?) -> 'it' is required in this case.
2. The sentence is no more graceful because of the subject is changed.
Army is... 2000 yrs old and took more than 36 yrs is more graceful than army is 2000 yrs and 700,000 artisans took ..
3. Missing COMMA infront of " and' is a hint to use same subject'
The army of terra-cotta warriors created to protect Qin Shi Huang,
China's first emperor, in his afterlife is more than 2,000 years old and ; ( It would have been " years , and "[/i]
Join the discussion

by Dean Jones » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:55 am
OA is option C
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1