BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Terminating decimals

Expert replies
by valleeny » Sat Jan 02, 2010 3:57 am
How do we handle terminating decimals question like the one below?

If r and s are positive integers and the ratio r/s is expressed as a decimal, is r/s a terminating decimal?
(1) 90<r<100
(2) s=4

Now I read the explanation for the answer and it says any number divided by 4 is terminating decimal. How can you draw qucik conclusions for all the other divisors?

For eg.
Any number divided by :
1, has a terminating decimal
2, has a terminating decimal (0.5, 1)
3, does not have a terminating decimal (0.333..., 0.666..., 1)
4, has a terminating decimal (0.25, 0.5, 1)
5, has a terminating decimal (0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1)
6, may or may not have a terminating decimal (0.166..., 0.333..., 0.5, 0.666..., 0.833...)

Is this the right way to evaluate each divisor whether they will yield a terminating decimal? Or is there a set of rules that will be easier memorized than derived on the spot?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by cameronwu » Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:19 pm
As far as I know, there's no other way around it other than being familiar with property of numbers. The building blocks of division don't get much more basic than this, unfortunately.
Join the discussion

by Testluv » Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:07 am
Is this the right way to evaluate each divisor whether they will yield a terminating decimal? Or is there a set of rules that will be easier memorized than derived on the spot?
If you have the fraction completely simplified, and in the prime factorization of the denominator you only have 2s or you only have 5s (or only 2s and 5s), then it is a terminating decimal. If you have the fraction completley simplified, and in the prime factorization of the denominator, there are primes other than 2 and/or 5, then it is a repeating (non-terminating) decimal.
Now I read the explanation for the answer and it says any number divided by 4 is terminating decimal.
Yes, because 4 has only 2s in its prime factorization. Therefore, any number dividied by 4 is a terminating decimal. The same can be said about any number divided by 8, and so on.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by valleeny » Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:31 am
Thanks Testluv. That was a good shortcut to know. I think it's possible but I don't suppose it's necessary to understand the basics behind it. I'm just gonna remember this rule.
Join the discussion