BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tense Only

Expert replies
by imskpwr » Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:44 am
After the company recalled one of its best-selling products, it would be forced to accept a one billion dollar loss, an expense that would have forced its main competitor to declare bankruptcy if it had suffered such a loss.

(A) After the company recalled one of its best-selling products, it would be forced to accept a one billion dollar loss, an expense that would have forced its main competitor to declare bankruptcy if it had suffered such a loss.

(B) As the company recalled one of its best-selling products, it accepted a one billion dollar loss; forcing its main competitor to declare bankruptcy if it had suffered such a loss.

(C) After the company recalled one of its best-selling products, its one billion dollar loss would have to be accepted; such a loss would have forced its main competitor to declare bankruptcy.

(D) After the company recalled one of its best-selling products, it was forced to accept a one billion dollar loss; its main competitor would have been forced to declare bankruptcy if it had suffered such a loss.

(E) When the company recalled one of its best-selling products, a one billion dollar loss it was forced to accept, an expense that would have forced its main competitor into bankruptcy.

OA is D
Experts pls. explain the meaning conveyed by A and D (considering changes in tense only).
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by MakeUrTimeCount » Wed Jan 18, 2012 3:31 am
3 things:
A) Chronical Events:
1) The company recalled one of its best-selling products
2) The company was forced to accept a one billion dollar loss.

Would is the past tense of will. But above 2 events have already happened in past. So use of would is wrong.

B) Comma vs semicolon
2nd part of the sentence is not dependent on 1st so use semicolon.

C) Use of correct term
Loss is not an expense always. It can be unrealized profit.
Join the discussion

by imskpwr » Wed Jan 18, 2012 5:48 am
MakeUrTimeCount wrote:3 things:
A) Chronical Events:
1) The company recalled one of its best-selling products
2) The company was forced to accept a one billion dollar loss.

Would is the past tense of will. But above 2 events have already happened in past. So use of would is wrong.
Please explain how u established this chronological order.

As per GMAT, "would" is acceptable either in "if-conditional" or in "Reported speech".

So, Option A can be ruled out as the first "would" is not correct.
But the change in meaning is still not very clear to me.


what if i say,

"if the company recalled one of its best selling products, it would be forced to accept a one billion dollar loss."

what about the meaning and chronological order here?
Join the discussion

by MakeUrTimeCount » Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:00 am
imskpwr,
1) I said chronical because the events happened one after another. The word 'after' made me think so.

After Jenny submitted the document, she collected the payment.
- 1st event: Jenny submitted the document
- 2nd event: Jenny collected the payment

2) You are right about if and would.
But the question does not use 'if' for the 1st sentence. (It uses after)
So we can't use subjunctive mood here.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1