BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Tense issue - Manhattan CAT

Expert replies
by Sayan_1987 » Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:39 pm
In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

A) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been
B) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
C) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being
D) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
E) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be

I will share the OA after sometime .
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by ankit0411 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:30 am
Sayan_1987 wrote:In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

A) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been
B) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
C) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being
D) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
E) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be

I will share the OA after sometime .
IMO- B .

Proper usage of past tense and makes sense.


Thanks,
Ankit
Don't predict future , create it !
Join the discussion

by das.ashmita » Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:09 am
IMO B
Errors are marked in red.

A) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been
B) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was - CORRECT
C) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being
D) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
E) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be
Join the discussion

by nisagl750 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 4:26 am
Sayan_1987 wrote:In 1860, the Philological Society launched its effort to create a dictionary more comprehensive than the world had ever seen; although the project would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been born.

A) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary had been
B) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
C) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was being
D) would take more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was
E) took more than 60 years to complete, the Oxford English Dictionary was about to be

I will share the OA after sometime .


took is better than would
and about to be is unnecessarily wordy

IMO - B
Join the discussion

by Sayan_1987 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:08 am
OA - D

Not sure why the answer is D. I also answered B . Can anyone explain please ?
Join the discussion

by ankit0411 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 8:32 pm
Sayan_1987 wrote:OA - D

Not sure why the answer is D. I also answered B . Can anyone explain please ?
Reading the question again, I think I found the issue.

In B, using past tense in both the clauses means that both the events happened at the same time whereas this is not the case.

The book was first born and then completed after 60 years.

So we actually need to have different tense for both and indicate that both the events are happening at different times.

Second half of the statement has to be simple past with "was" .

For something that was started in 1820 and completed after 60 years we surely will need a "would".

Hence, strike off B and arrive at D.
Don't predict future , create it !
Join the discussion

by nisagl750 » Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:08 pm
ankit0411 wrote:
Sayan_1987 wrote:OA - D

Not sure why the answer is D. I also answered B . Can anyone explain please ?
Reading the question again, I think I found the issue.

In B, using past tense in both the clauses means that both the events happened at the same time whereas this is not the case.

The book was first born and then completed after 60 years.

So we actually need to have different tense for both and indicate that both the events are happening at different times.

Second half of the statement has to be simple past with "was" .

For something that was started in 1820 and completed after 60 years we surely will need a "would".

Hence, strike off B and arrive at D.
That makes sense.
Join the discussion

by Sayan_1987 » Thu Aug 30, 2012 11:31 am
Yes, makes sense . Thanks .
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1