BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ten-percentage-point increase in cigarette prices

Expert replies
by AnjaliOberoi » Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:07 pm
In the past, every ten-percentage-point increase in cigarette prices in the country of Coponia
has decreased per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent. Coponia is about to raise taxes on
cigarettes by 9 cents per pack. The average price of cigarettes in Coponia is and has been for
more than a year 90 cents per pack. So the tax hike stands an excellent chance of reducing
per capita sales of cigarettes by four percent. Which of the following is an assumption on
which the argument depends?


A. Tobacco companies are unlikely to reduce their profit per pack of cigarettes to avoid an
increase in the cost per pack to consumers in Coponia.
B. Previous increases in cigarette prices in Coponia have generally been due to increases in
taxes on cigarettes.
C. Any decrease in per capita sales of cigarettes in Coponia will result mainly from an increase
in the number of people who quit smoking entirely.
D. At present, the price of a pack of cigarettes in Coponia includes taxes that amount to less than
ten percent of the total selling price.
E. The number of people in Coponia who smoke cigarettes has remained relatively constant for
the past several years.

OA A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:59 pm
Hi AnjaliOberoi,

This CR prompt is based on "causality" - the idea that one thing will cause another thing to happen. When dealing with causality, there are a number of assumptions, but the primary assumption is that "everything else will stay the same."

The Facts:
-In the past, a 10% increase in cigarette prices has decreased per-capita sales by 4% in Coponia.
-Coponia is about to raise taxes on cigarettes by 9 cents (the current price of cigarettes averages 90 cents/pack, so this represents a 10% increase in price).

The Conclusion:
-The tax hike stands an excellent chance of reducing per-capita sales by 4%.

The Logic:
With this new tax, the conclusion that per-capita sales would drop by 4% seems logical (based on historical data). For this causal argument to hold true, we have to assume that "everything else stays the same" - the number of smokers, the population, the fixed price per pack of cigarettes before this new tax takes effect, etc. We have to assume that the cigarette companies won't lower the price of cigarettes to offset the tax. The only answer that addresses the issue that everything will stay the same is Answer A.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

by AnjaliOberoi » Mon Jun 02, 2014 12:25 am
Hi Rich,

I am new to the CR section.My question might sound weird but i want to know why we assuming that everything else stays the same.

Also, Is the answer choice {D} weakens the conclusion to some extent?? My understanding says that increase in the tax amount by more than 10% would reduce the per capita sales by more than 4%, while the conclusion states that sales will be reduced by 4%...so somehow weakens the conclusion..
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Mon Jun 02, 2014 9:29 am
Con: So the tax hike stands an excellent chance of reducing per capita sales of cigarettes by four percen

To show: it doesn't

{A} Tobacco companies are likely to reduce their profit per pack of cigarettes to avoid an increase in the cost per pack to consumers in Coponia; KEEP
{B} Previous increases in cigarette prices in Coponia have generally NOT been due to increases in taxes on cigarettes. IGNORE
{C} Any decrease in per capita sales of cigarettes in Coponia will NOT result mainly from an increase in the number of people who quit smoking entirely. IGNORE
{D} At present, the price of a pack of cigarettes in Coponia DOESNT includes taxes that amount to less than ten percent of the total selling price. IGNORE
{E} The number of people in Coponia who smoke cigarettes has NOT remained relatively constant for the past several years. IGNORE
R A H U L
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Jun 02, 2014 11:33 am
Hi AnjaliOberoi,

CR prompts that are based on Causality must assume that everything else stays the same because if other things changed, then there'd be no way to present a causality-based argument.

Here's an example:

There's a strong causal argument that regularly exercising leads to a healthier life. If you don't exercise now, but start exercising regularly, then you'll probably get in "better shape", lose weight, etc. This assumes that everything else in your life will stay about the same. If, however, you start eating LOTS of junk food, then you might get in "worse shape", gain weight, etc., even though you're exercising. The argument for the benefits of exercising regularly are built on the assumption that the other aspects of your life will stay consistent.

GMAT CR prompts are built on that same general idea: everything else stays the same.

As to your other question, Answer D is irrelevant to the prompt. The current amount of tax on cigarettes in Coponia has no effect on the issue. The country is about to RAISE TAXES 9 cents, meaning that it's a new tax that wasn't there before and this new tax will decrease sales.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion