BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Temp in Canada

Expert replies
by neha.patni » Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:08 am
On a recent expedition to a remote region of northern Canada, scientists uncovered skeletal remains from about 100,000 years ago. Surprisingly, all the skeletal remains, which included many species from differing biological families and spanned about two thousand years, showed evidence of experiencing temperatures in excess of 1000 degrees Fahrenheit (or 538 degrees Celsius).

Which of the following, if true, best explains the apparent paradox between the cold environment and the evidence of the bones experiencing hot temperatures?

A) Other scientific research released two years before the expedition showed that the remote region of northern Canada underwent considerable warming in the past 100,000 years.
B) Chemical changes that naturally occur during the process of decay in only one north Canadian species produce the same evidence of the species' skeletons being exposed to hot temperatures as the expedition scientists found.
C) A little over 103,000 years ago, a large fire is known to have occurred in northern Canada.
D) Strong evidence exists that as early as 70,000 years ago, Homo sapiens around the world relied heavily on fire to cook animals.
E) In the same expedition and in roughly the same layer of excavation, scientists found rudimentary wood cutting and hunting tools used by early humans.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by outreach » Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:26 am
is this a gmat question?
is the answer E .

neha.patni wrote:On a recent expedition to a remote region of northern Canada, scientists uncovered skeletal remains from about 100,000 years ago. Surprisingly, all the skeletal remains, which included many species from differing biological families and spanned about two thousand years, showed evidence of experiencing temperatures in excess of 1000 degrees Fahrenheit (or 538 degrees Celsius).

Which of the following, if true, best explains the apparent paradox between the cold environment and the evidence of the bones experiencing hot temperatures?

A) Other scientific research released two years before the expedition showed that the remote region of northern Canada underwent considerable warming in the past 100,000 years.
B) Chemical changes that naturally occur during the process of decay in only one north Canadian species produce the same evidence of the species' skeletons being exposed to hot temperatures as the expedition scientists found.
C) A little over 103,000 years ago, a large fire is known to have occurred in northern Canada.
D) Strong evidence exists that as early as 70,000 years ago, Homo sapiens around the world relied heavily on fire to cook animals.
E) In the same expedition and in roughly the same layer of excavation, scientists found rudimentary wood cutting and hunting tools used by early humans.
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by selango » Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:54 am
What is the source of this question?

IMO E.

The region is cold and skeletal remains show evidence of experiencing very hot temperatures.

If early people cut wood to cook animals in Fires.This resolve the paradox by providing evidence about skeleton experiencing high temp.
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:10 am
Since passage talks abt all skeleton, it means that human skeletons as well, am I right? In that case how E????

IMO C

Edited - Agree that E is better. I am frustrated with 100% failure rate in CR

Here is the explaination to this question

https://www.platinumgmat.com/practice_gm ... ion_id=617
selango wrote:What is the source of this question?

IMO E.

The region is cold and skeletal remains show evidence of experiencing very hot temperatures.

If early people cut wood to cook animals in Fires.This resolve the paradox by providing evidence about skeleton experiencing high temp.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by neha.patni » Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:53 am
selango wrote:What is the source of this question?

IMO E.

The region is cold and skeletal remains show evidence of experiencing very hot temperatures.

If early people cut wood to cook animals in Fires.This resolve the paradox by providing evidence about skeleton experiencing high temp.

OA E

This is a platinum GMAT question, but i haven't understood the explanation. What is wrong with answer C. experts please help
Join the discussion

by selango » Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:57 am
This is a paradox question.The answer option must discuss about both cases.

The answer option must discuss about evidence of hot temp[using fire] and skeletal remains.

Option C provide evidence only to hot temp.But what about the skeletal remains?No evidence or no case in the answer option.

Hence option C is not correct.
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by crackinggmat » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:01 am
isn,t in C ....it discusses a situation of about 103 000 yrs ago,while in question we are considering only those species which were since last 100,000 yrs ago....

moreover if E is ok...what is wrong with A .....IT SAYS A BIG WARMING EVENT OCCURED IN NORTHERN REGION OF CANADA ....IN PAST 100,000YRS...IS IT WRONG FOR WRITTING REMOTE REGIONS....

pls shed some light...
Join the discussion

by gmat1011 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:10 am
I don't think this is very representative of a real GMAT question (based on my limited experience so far)

E requires you to assume the fires started with the wood would hit 1000 C

By the same token the "considerable warming" over the past 100,000 years in A could have also baked the remains real good! lets conveniently assume the temperatures over time or at a particular time hit 1000 C to nicely fry the bones....
Join the discussion