BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

telephone

Expert replies
by ketkoag » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:22 am
Sales of telephones have increased dramatically over the last year. In order to take advantage of this increase, Mammoth Industries plans to expand production of its own model of telephone, while continuing its already very extensive advertising of this product.
Which of the following, if true, provides most support for the view that Mammoth Industries cannot increase its sales of telephones by adopting the plan outlined above?
(A) Although it sells all of the telephones that it produces, Mammoth Industries’ share of all telephone sales has declined over the last year.
(B) Mammoth Industries’ average inventory of telephones awaiting shipment to retailers has declined slightly over the last year.
(C) Advertising has made the brand name of Mammoth Industries’ telephones widely known, but few consumers know that Mammoth Industries owns this brand.
(D) Mammoth Industries’ telephone is one of three brands of telephone that have together accounted for the bulk of the last year’s increase in sales.
(E) Despite a slight decline in the retail price, sales of Mammoth Industries’ telephones have fallen in the last year.

whats wrong with A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

telephone

by vyomb » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:30 am
The answer should be C

refer the below statement-
Mammoth industries relies on advertising.. so if advertisement of the product is weak then we can point out the statement that weakens the plan.
Mammoth Industries plans to expand production of its own model of telephone, while continuing its already very extensive advertising of this product
Join the discussion

Re: telephone

by Vemuri » Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:35 am
IMO E.
Join the discussion

by sudeep_ar » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:09 am
IMO E..
Join the discussion

Re: telephone

by gmatstud » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:19 am
IMO E. What is OA?

Here we need to find an answer that proves that Mammoth industries cannot increase sales by increasing the production of its models.

A- As it sells all telephones, if it produces more, it may sell those also. This can support Mammoth's plans

B- Here, its more of a supply-chain management issue. irrelevant.

C- Mamoth may not care for the brand as long as its product sells.

D- No flaw here. May support Mammoth's plans instead

E- Here, even though the price went down, sales of Mammoth ndustries telephones went down. So increasing the production will not help here as they are not even selling their current production of telephones. This is a flaw in what Mammoth plans to do. Hence E.
Join the discussion

by Musicolo » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:30 am
Its really a tough choice between A and E. When constrained with time at test taking I would go for E but can not offer wise explanation why E instead of A. Just a hunch.
Can someone offer some better explanation?
Join the discussion

by sudeep_ar » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:48 am
Musicolo wrote:Its really a tough choice between A and E. When constrained with time at test taking I would go for E but can not offer wise explanation why E instead of A. Just a hunch.
Can someone offer some better explanation?
A) Although it sells all of the telephones that it produces, Mammoth Industries’ share of all telephone sales has declined over the last year.
==> It implies that MI is selling all the inventory of that telephone but still market share declined. So that means if MI increase the inventory (as per plan) then also it can sell the telephone and increase the market share.
So it doesn't weaken but strengthen the argument.
Join the discussion

Re: telephone

by ketkoag » Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:13 am
Vemuri wrote:IMO E.
please explain why u didn't select A..
Join the discussion

by dtweah » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:30 pm
Musicolo wrote:Its really a tough choice between A and E. When constrained with time at test taking I would go for E but can not offer wise explanation why E instead of A. Just a hunch.
Can someone offer some better explanation?
“Although it sells all of the telephones that it produces, Mammoth Industries’ share of all telephone sales has declined over the last year. “

Nothing above suggests that Mammoth’s telephone sales cannot increase the next year. Remember, Mammoth is doing extensive advertisement as stated in the passage, so just b/c sales fell last year doesn’t mean they cannot rise next year.

In E. Mammoth has already lowered price. Does it have to sell at price 0 before it makes profit? You have a strong reason to believe that despite advertisement, sales will not increase, since with lower price sales still has not increased. This price information separates A and E.
Join the discussion

by ketkoag » Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:17 am
dtweah wrote:
Musicolo wrote:Its really a tough choice between A and E. When constrained with time at test taking I would go for E but can not offer wise explanation why E instead of A. Just a hunch.
Can someone offer some better explanation?
“Although it sells all of the telephones that it produces, Mammoth Industries’ share of all telephone sales has declined over the last year. “

Nothing above suggests that Mammoth’s telephone sales cannot increase the next year. Remember, Mammoth is doing extensive advertisement as stated in the passage, so just b/c sales fell last year doesn’t mean they cannot rise next year.

In E. Mammoth has already lowered price. Does it have to sell at price 0 before it makes profit? You have a strong reason to believe that despite advertisement, sales will not increase, since with lower price sales still has not increased. This price information separates A and E.
thanks for a nice explanation.. I overlooked this detail, ahh what was i thinking!! :o
OA is E
Join the discussion

by sudeep_ar » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:11 am
dtweah wrote: “Although it sells all of the telephones that it produces, Mammoth Industries’ share of all telephone sales has declined over the last year. “

Nothing above suggests that Mammoth’s telephone sales cannot increase the next year. Remember, Mammoth is doing extensive advertisement as stated in the passage, so just b/c sales fell last year doesn’t mean they cannot rise next year.
dtweah,

I want to add. As already wrote earlier in above it is not implying the sales have fallen but rather the share of sales has declined.
e.g. where sales can rise even when share of sales has fallen.
2 years back : total sales: 100 MI sales: 50 ==> share (50%)
1 year back : total sales: 150 MI sales: 60 ==> share (40%)
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:42 pm
My intuition whispers that it is A
Join the discussion