BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

teenagers doomed!

Critical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension
Expert replies
by ashish1354 » Wed Oct 07, 2009 10:30 pm
Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum wage has risen.
(B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant.
(C) Employers often hire extra help during holiday and warm weather seasons.
(D) The teenage unemployment rate rose more quickly in the 1970's than it did in the 1960's.
(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.

OA after some replies
Join the discussion
Source: — Verbal Reasoning |

by punitkaur » Thu Oct 08, 2009 11:18 am
IMO C?
Join the discussion

by artistocrat » Wed Oct 14, 2009 11:47 am
The answer is B.
Join the discussion

by kiennguyen » Thu Oct 22, 2009 12:41 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

i got stuck!

by kiennguyen » Sat Oct 24, 2009 12:21 am
anybody please specifies your answers! OA plese!
Join the discussion

Good Question

by nakul_anand » Sun Oct 25, 2009 1:23 pm
I think the right answer is (B)
Join the discussion

by mridula » Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:53 am
ashish1354 wrote:Teenagers are often priced out of the labor market by the government-mandated minimum-wage level because employers cannot afford to pay that much for extra help. Therefore, if Congress institutes a subminimum wage, a new lower legal wage for teenagers, the teenage unemployment rate, which has been rising since 1960, will no longer increase.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen when the minimum wage has risen.
(B) Since 1960 the teenage unemployment rate has risen even when the minimum wage remained constant.
(C) Employers often hire extra help during holiday and warm weather seasons.
(D) The teenage unemployment rate rose more quickly in the 1970's than it did in the 1960's.
(E) The teenage unemployment rate has occasionally declined in the years since 1960.

OA after some replies
Answer should be A.
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Tue Jan 19, 2010 3:04 am
Join the discussion

by bhartiindia » Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:24 pm
IMO A bt why not E??
Join the discussion

by komal » Tue Jan 26, 2010 5:44 am
3)Author states teenage unemployment rate will cease to rise if minimum wage is lowered. To weaken this we have to prove minimum wage has no effect on unemployment rate.
A.Supports the argument.
B. correct if unemployment rate keeps on rising when minimum wage is constant then this weakens the conclusion
C.Irrelevant
D.Irrelevant
E. this happens only once in a while and has no impact on the conclusion
Join the discussion

by Vipulvp » Tue Aug 03, 2010 8:35 am
komal wrote:3)Author states teenage unemployment rate will cease to rise if minimum wage is lowered. To weaken this we have to prove minimum wage has no effect on unemployment rate.
A.Supports the argument.
B. correct if unemployment rate keeps on rising when minimum wage is constant then this weakens the conclusion
C.Irrelevant
D.Irrelevant
E. this happens only once in a while and has no impact on the conclusion
I am still not convinced. The argument talks about sub-minimum wages and not the minimum wages. What the author probably meant was that employers are not willing to pay the amount they normally pay to adult to teenagers. So the minimum wages (as opposed to the sub-minimum wages) are actually irrelevant. Another way of weakening could be: Employers find it more profitable to ask some of their existing employees to finish off the extra work in return for handsome overtime than to employ teenagers at the new sub-minimum rates.
Join the discussion