BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Technological Development

Expert replies
by rkanthilal » Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:35 pm
Analyst: The pace of technological development brings a constant stream of new devices to the market, and many of them enjoy commercial success. But announcing new technology too soon after the introduction of a successful device can backfire. Once consumers hear about the new device, they may stop buying the one currently on sale. So, if a company wishes to announce the upcoming sale of a new device, it should wait until purchases of the old device have begun to decline.

Which of the following, if true, would best support the analyst's main assertion?

(A) New technology often becomes less expensive after an initial surge in sales.

(B) Media outlets, such as television programs and magazines, often report on the planned introduction of new devices while the sales of old devices are still strong.

(C) Many consumers are unable to determine whether new technology is superior to current technology.

(D) Surveys have shown that some consumers make only one or two technology purchases per year, whereas others make more frequent purchases.

(E) Consumers tend to be loyal to technology companies whose products they enjoy using.

Source: MGMAT practice test.
OA after a few responses...
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by beat_gmat_09 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:56 pm
B supports.
Hope is the dream of a man awake
Join the discussion

by bakhshaliyev » Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:03 pm
My answer is E
Join the discussion

by Deepthi Subbu » Wed Dec 01, 2010 7:40 pm
Even I go with B
Join the discussion

by rkanthilal » Wed Dec 01, 2010 8:36 pm
OA is B

Below is the OE for each answer...

(A) The typical drop in the price of new technology does not influence whether a company should wait until sales of an old technology begin to decline before introducing a new one.

(B) CORRECT. This choice states that media outlets such as television and magazines often report on the planned introduction of new devices while sales of old devices are still strong. The argument requires that consumers "hear about the new device"; stories in the media provide a means for consumers to do so.

(C) If many consumers are unable to determine the superiority of new technology, then they might be less swayed to wait for a new, recently announced device than otherwise. As a result, this claim may be seen to weaken the analyst's assertion.

(D) The number of technology purchases per year does not directly relate to this argument. The argument is about waiting until the consumer demand declines before announcing a new technology. However frequently consumers typically purchase technology, some will be ready to buy the old device when news of the upcoming device gets out -- and according to the argument, this news will cause some of those consumers to wait.

(E) The passage makes no mention of whether the technologies belong to the same company or different companies.
Join the discussion

by jaymw » Fri Mar 25, 2011 5:23 am
Sorry to bring this thread up again!

Just came across this question in an MGMAT CAT.

I noticed that this thread does not contain any reasoning other than that employed by MGMAT in their explanation.

B is the credited response

BUT I can't seem to grasp even the slightest bit of the logic used to arrive at that answer choice.

The prompt says: "[...]But announcing new technology too soon after the introduction of a successful device can backfire. Once consumers hear about the new device, they may stop buying the one currently on sale. So, if a company wishes to announce the upcoming sale of a new device, it should wait until purchases of the old device have begun to decline.

In my words: When sales are still strong it is dumb to announce new product.

and now answer choice B says: Media outlets, such as television programs and magazines, often report on the planned introduction of new devices while the sales of old devices are still strong.

Is it just me or does this answer choice describe exactly what companies should NOT do??? It basically states that in this scenario, new products are announced when their sales have NOT YET declined. This is contradictory to the information in the prompt and should hence be a weakener, rather than a strengthener!

It would be great if an (MGMAT) expert could comment on this problem!

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by fitzgerald23 » Fri Mar 25, 2011 6:57 am
jaymw wrote:Sorry to bring this thread up again!

Just came across this question in an MGMAT CAT.

I noticed that this thread does not contain any reasoning other than that employed by MGMAT in their explanation.

B is the credited response

BUT I can't seem to grasp even the slightest bit of the logic used to arrive at that answer choice.

The prompt says: "[...]But announcing new technology too soon after the introduction of a successful device can backfire. Once consumers hear about the new device, they may stop buying the one currently on sale. So, if a company wishes to announce the upcoming sale of a new device, it should wait until purchases of the old device have begun to decline.

In my words: When sales are still strong it is dumb to announce new product.

and now answer choice B says: Media outlets, such as television programs and magazines, often report on the planned introduction of new devices while the sales of old devices are still strong.

Is it just me or does this answer choice describe exactly what companies should NOT do??? It basically states that in this scenario, new products are announced when their sales have NOT YET declined. This is contradictory to the information in the prompt and should hence be a weakener, rather than a strengthener!

It would be great if an (MGMAT) expert could comment on this problem!

Thanks!
Here is how you should look at the passage.

1. Announcing new technology too soon can backfire
2. Once consumers hear about it they stop buying the current product
3. Dont announce sales until your old product sales are falling

I think you might be missing what the question is asking. They want to know the assumption the author makes for points 1 and 2 to lead to the conclusion, which is point 3. The real important part to answering the question correctly lies in statement 2. Consumers need to hear about the new technology before they stop buying the old product. How do they hear about it? The media.

Think about it like this. Apple has a new iPod that it will be releasing in the next year and Steve Jobs sends out a release to all the magazines and newspapers about this great new iPod. But the papers and magazines decide they dont care anymore about Apple and are sick of giving them free publicity so they dont run the release or discuss the new technology in their editorials. How would you, as the consumer, know that there is a new iPod coming? You wouldnt. The consumer typically finds out about new things through media reports. Jobs cant come to everyones home and tell them about the new product. Its the old "if a tree falls in the forest and nobody is around, does it make a sound" type theory.

So if option B was not true than it would damage the analysts reasoning. If the consumer didnt hear about it what difference did it make if you announced it. None because existing sales would not be impacted.
Join the discussion

by Target2009 » Fri Mar 25, 2011 4:03 pm
fitzgerald23 wrote: So if option B was not true than it would damage the analysts reasoning. If the consumer didnt hear about it what difference did it make if you announced it. None because existing sales would not be impacted.
Agree cause only B a little support the given argument. But this is also true It does not supporting without a new assumption that media is only way to let public know about product. So it is supporting the premise "Once consumers hear about it they stop buying the current product " not the conclusion " Dont announce sales until your old product sales are falling" and thats making this choice little confusing.
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Join the discussion