BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

symbol

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

Re: symbol

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:40 am
billyr wrote:Why statement 1 alone suff?

i thought statement 1 is insuff since the symbol can be addition or multiplication?

Thanks
The good news is that you're right. The bad news is that you're also wrong!

You're 100% correct that, based on statement (1), we can't determine if the operation is addition or multiplication.

However, you're not answering the correct question. In Data Sufficiency, we have to make sure our focus is in the right place.

The question is NOT: "which of the 4 operations does the triangle represent?" The question is: "is the equation listed true?"

Since that equation holds true for BOTH addition and multiplication, statement (1) gives us a definite "YES" answer to the question: sufficient.

Statement (2), on the other hand, holds true for addition and subtraction. The original equation holds true for addition, but NOT for subtraction, so (2) can give us both a "YES" and a "NO" answer: insufficient.

(1) is sufficient alone, (2) isn't: choose (A).
Last edited by Stuart@KaplanGMAT on Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by BuckeyeT » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:40 am
(1) In order for this to be correct, the symbol can be either + or * (addition of multiplication).

However, we're not asked whether we can determine exactly what the symbol means. We're asked if the statement is true.

Plugging in + for the symbol works.
Plugging in * for the symbol works.

So, even though the symbol could be two different things, they both result in the same true answer to the question. So (1) is sufficient.

(2) Could be either + or - (addition or subtration).
When we plug them in...

Plugging in + for the symbol works.
Plugging in - for the symbol does not work.

These answers conflict. So (2) is insufficient.

Answer A.
Join the discussion

Re: symbol

by hk » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:43 am
billyr wrote:Why statement 1 alone suff?

i thought statement 1 is insuff since the symbol can be addition or multiplication?

Thanks
Same here... Any explanations.. I tried substituting too, but just cant figure it out!!!
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion

Re: symbol

by hk » Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:46 am
Thanks stuart/billy!!!
Oh my god i think i need some serious practice!!!!! This is the second time today %@#$%@$%
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
Join the discussion