BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Swartkans

Expert replies
by sankruth » Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:56 am
Answers with explanations please...

In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragments dating back 1 million years. Analysis of the fragments, which came from a variety of animals, showed that they had been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood, the most common tree around Swartkans.

Which of the following, if true, would, together with the information above, provide the best basis for the claim that the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids?
(A) The white stinkwood tree is used for building material by the present-day inhabitants of Swartkans.
(B) Forest fires can heat wood to a range of temperatures that occur in campfires.
(C) The bone fragments were fitted together by the archaeologists to form the complete skeletons of several animals.
(D) Apart from the Swartkans discovery, there is reliable evidence that early hominids used fire as many as 500 thousand years ago.
(E) The bone fragments were found in several distinct layers of limestone that contained primitive cutting tools known to have been used by early hominids.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by v_shiv » Mon Dec 24, 2007 1:15 am
I will go with E. The only thing that needs to be proved in the given statement is that the bones were not charred by the forest fire but by humans. And E supports this by proving that these animals were cut by the tools before being burnt.
Join the discussion

by sankruth » Mon Dec 24, 2007 2:39 am
v_shiv wrote:I will go with E. The only thing that needs to be proved in the given statement is that the bones were not charred by the forest fire but by humans. And E supports this by proving that these animals were cut by the tools before being burnt.
Yes, I agree that the tools found near animal bones prove that the bones were perhaps broken by tools before they were charred. But it still does not prove conclusively that the bones were charred by by human created fires rather than by forest fires.
Join the discussion

by sujaysolanki » Wed Dec 26, 2007 2:44 am
Join the discussion

by komal » Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:44 pm
In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragments dating back 1 million years. Analysis of the fragments, which came from a variety of animals, showed that they had been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood, the most common tree around Swartkans.

Which of the following, if true, would, together with the information above, provide the best basis for the claim that the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids?

This question is in OG 12 and the explanation given is as follows :
A Today's use of stinkwood for building is irrelevant to the argument.

B This suggests that forest fires could have been responsible for the charring, so it weakens the argument.

C This information offers no support to the argument that early hominids used fire.

D The fragments date back one million years, so evidence from 500,000 years ago is irrelevant.

E Correct. This information links early hominids to these bone fragments and so strengthens the
argument.
Join the discussion

by tyronetan82 » Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:47 am
I agree, I found this very tricky. I found E a bit deceiving as this doesn't prove that the bone fragments were used to create fires by early hominids. The stimulus just states that bone fragments were used as TOOLS. Please elaborate BTG friends.
Join the discussion

by tyronetan82 » Thu Aug 19, 2010 7:49 am
Also... would you guys consider this as a Strengthen question or a Must Be True question?

Thanks!
Join the discussion

by melguy » Wed Nov 23, 2011 5:40 pm
komal wrote:E Correct. This information links early hominids to these bone fragments and so strengthens the
argument.


I got it right by POE but i cannot link the hominids to fire and bones. What is the missing link that covers up the argument? Also, what is the relevance of lime stone in this arugment?

Please help me understand :-)
Join the discussion

by amit2k9 » Mon Nov 28, 2011 2:15 am
crystal E here.Lime stone for showing the timeline and preserved things for the basis of the claim.

E it is.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion

by sk8legend408 » Tue Nov 29, 2011 4:50 am
The link here is the tools that were also discovered along with the bone fragments. E states that the tools are known to have been used by early hominids.
Join the discussion

by veenu08 » Sat May 04, 2013 1:14 am
Can an expert please help how to determine E as the answer.
This is something I am getting from ruling out the other options.
Join the discussion

by Ankur87 » Sat May 04, 2013 4:56 am
Hi Veenu,
This question is little tricky and you can reach correct answer by POE


A The white stinkwood tree is used for building material by the present-day inhabitants of Swartkans. Irrelevant

B Forest fires can heat wood to a range of temperatures that occur in campfires.
It weakens the argument as we need to give evidence regarding the use of fire by early hominids.

C The bone fragments were fitted together by the archaeologists to form the complete skeletons of several animals.
Irrelevant

D Apart from the Swartkans discovery, there is reliable evidence that early hominids used fire as many as 500 thousand years ago.
Our objective is 1 million yrs not .5 million

E Correct. This information links early hominids to these bone fragments and so strengthens the
argument.
Best Of All. Other choices have no link with fragments dating back 1 million years.
veenu08 wrote:Can an expert please help how to determine E as the answer.
This is something I am getting from ruling out the other options.
Join the discussion