BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

SV40

Expert replies
by crackgmat007 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:05 pm
Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a slow-developing
cancer, researchers believe that infection by the SV40 virus is a contributing cause, since
in the United States 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas, but none from
healthy tissue, contain SV40. SV40 is a monkey virus; however, in 1960 some polio
vaccine was contaminated with the virus. Researchers hypothesize that this vaccine was
the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the researchers’ hypothesis?
A. SV40 is widely used as a research tool in cancer laboratories.
B. Changes in the technique of manufacturing the vaccine now prevent
contamination with SV40.
C. Recently discovered samples of the vaccine dating from 1960 still show traces of
the virus.
D. In a small percentage of cases of mesothelioma, there is no history of exposure to
asbestos.
E. In Finland, where the polio vaccine was never contaminated, samples from
mesotheliomas do not contain SV40.

For discussion. OA to follow
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by italian7745 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:36 pm
IMO E

SV40 -------Mesotheliomas.....
60% Tissues from Mesotheliomas ----SV40....

However , in1960... Polio Vaccine was contaminated with SV40....So ....Polio Vaccine was the source...

E direclty supports the researchers hypothesis...by mentioning a place where polio vaccine was not contaminated and the samples from mesotheliomas there did not contain SV40....
Join the discussion

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:48 pm
Agree with E
Join the discussion

by armaan700+ » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:41 pm
IMO C
Join the discussion

by Spring2009 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:48 pm
I think E.
Join the discussion

by ananda271181 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
IMO: D

There are two conclusion in the above text, first is that the cancer development is aided by the virus, and the second claim is that the virus is spread from the infected vaccine.
The second conclusion is supported by both C & E. However , E contradicts the first conclusion while supporting the second conclusion. But I think the main conclusion here is the first one and it is being supported by D.

Experts please comment....
Ananda Chakraborty
Join the discussion

by viju9162 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:20 am
answer should be C
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group
Join the discussion

by Naruto » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:04 am
OA is E, i too fell for the C trap but later realised that even if traces of virus are found in the vaccine that does not proof its cause for the disease in patients it just re-affirms the contamination mentioned.

In E,
its like showing when cause does not occur the effect does not occur hence strengthens
Join the discussion

by crackgmat007 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:44 am
Me too.

Breaking down the stimulus, I agree that C is not the correct answer as it doesnt talk anything about the cause. It just affirms that traces polio vaccince has SV40 virus (supporting the premise)


C - SV40 virus --> Mesothelioma

P1 - 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas contain SV40 virus
P2 - In 1960, some polio vaccine was contaminated with the virus.

OA - E coz it states NO SV40 virus --> NO Mesothelioma. But I eliminated this as it appeared to be a mistaken negation. Any thoughts why it is not a mistaken negation?
Join the discussion

by ogbeni » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:29 pm
Naruto nailed it with this:

"In E,
its like showing when cause does not occur the effect does not occur hence strengthens"
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:53 pm
Guys can anyone give a decent reason why E is not right.
Join the discussion