Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Support - LSAT - Need help

Expert replies
by voodoo_child » Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:52 pm
PT37.2.22 -
Political theorist: Many people believe that the punishment of those who commit even the most heinous crimes should be mitigated to some extent if the crime was motivated by a sincere desire to achieve some larger good. Granted, some criminals with admirable motives deserve mitigated punishments. Nonetheless, judges should never mitigate punishment on the basis of motives, since motives are essentially a matter of conjecture and even vicious motives can easily be presented as altruistic.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the political theorist’s reasoning?
A. Law that prohibit or permit actions solely on the basis of psychological states should not be part of the legal system.
B. It is better to err on the side of overly sever punishment than to err on the side of overly lenient punishment.
C. The legal permissibility of actions should depend on the perceivable consequences of those actions.
D. No law that cannot be enforced should be enacted.
E. A legal system that, if adopted, would have disastrous consequences ought not be adopted.

OA - B.

Why is A incorrect? Thoughts?
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Tue Jul 03, 2012 6:29 pm
The problem with A is that the conclusion is specifically about the level of punishment issued and whether that level should be mitigated by motive. This is a separate issue from the laws themselves.
Join Veritas Prep’s 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by voodoo_child » Wed Jul 04, 2012 1:45 pm
Bill,
Thanks for reply. I have a follow-up question :

Conclusion - Judges should never mitigate punishment based on motives.

Premise - Motives are essentially a matter of conjecture and motives can be changed.

Assumption - Judges can know motives of criminals.
Assumption - Judges can influence the severity of punishment.

I see how B) is correct. But can we say that "Motives" are not "psychological state" in A?
Join the discussion

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Wed Jul 04, 2012 2:43 pm
On the LSAT, we would probably be expected to make that connection, but the GMAT is typically a bit more direct in its language...I think we could rule out A for that reason.
Join Veritas Prep’s 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by mmgmat » Wed Jul 04, 2012 10:07 pm
Please use spoiler for the OA.
Thanks for the question.
Join the discussion

by mv12 » Fri Jul 06, 2012 8:47 pm
Vodoo-child..pls try to learn how to use spoilers in your post.
voodoo_child wrote:PT37.2.22 -
Political theorist: Many people believe that the punishment of those who commit even the most heinous crimes should be mitigated to some extent if the crime was motivated by a sincere desire to achieve some larger good. Granted, some criminals with admirable motives deserve mitigated punishments. Nonetheless, judges should never mitigate punishment on the basis of motives, since motives are essentially a matter of conjecture and even vicious motives can easily be presented as altruistic.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the political theorist’s reasoning?
A. Law that prohibit or permit actions solely on the basis of psychological states should not be part of the legal system.
B. It is better to err on the side of overly sever punishment than to err on the side of overly lenient punishment.
C. The legal permissibility of actions should depend on the perceivable consequences of those actions.
D. No law that cannot be enforced should be enacted.
E. A legal system that, if adopted, would have disastrous consequences ought not be adopted.

OA - B.

Why is A incorrect? Thoughts?
Join the discussion