BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Sum of numbers

Expert replies
by bosky » Sun Dec 12, 2010 6:50 pm
Hello,

I am not find understanding the example from Kaplan 2011 Premier on Sum of numbers. It says sum = average * number of terms. I am having trouble with example on Pg 247:

What is the sum of all 27 3 digit integers that can be created by 1,2 & 3?

The solution calculates average of these numbers as (111+333)/2. Why is the average as given when clearly the group of these numbers is not consecutive. eg if I had 3, 6 & 18 and I had to average of these 3, the average is not is not the same as (3+18)/2...

Thanks,
Bosky
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Tani » Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:12 pm
First think about how the 27 numbers you need to sum are derived.

Look at the 100s digit. There will be nine numbers that start with 1, 9 starting with 2 and 9 starting with three. When you add these you get: 9*1 + 9*2 + 9*3 = 54 for 54 100s.

You get the same in the tens and units digits. The sum of all 27 numbers will be 54*100 + 54*10 + 54*1 = 5,994

Divide that by 27 and you get 222.
Tani Wolff
Join the discussion

by bosky » Mon Dec 13, 2010 8:49 am
Thanks Tani. Is there any other way to solve these problems?
Join the discussion

by KapTeacherEli » Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:03 pm
Hi bosky,

There actually isn't another way to solve it aside from Tani's. The solution you quoted from the GMaT Premier 2011 is scheduled for revision the next printing; sorry for the confusion it may have caused.

Fortunately, Tani's solution is quick, efficient, and a great way to crack this type of problem. And although Kapln does occasionally make mistakes, we take pride in our solutions and strategies, so don't let this error deter you from using the mathematical shortcuts and rules for actual consecutive sets. I checked those personally, and I can assure you that they're error free and extremely valuable!

Let me or Tani know if there is anything else we can do to help you, and thanks for choosing Kaplan.
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Join the discussion

by bosky » Mon Dec 13, 2010 9:37 pm
Thanks Tania and Eli for help in this question. The solution does make sense.
Join the discussion