BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Subscriptions to....

Expert replies
by factor26 » Sun Feb 12, 2012 5:23 pm
Cable-television spokesperson: Subscriptions to
cable television are a bargain in comparison to "free"
television. Remember that "free" television is not really
free. It is consumers, in the end, who pay for the
costly advertising that supports "free" television.
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the
position of the cable-television spokesperson?

(A) Consumers who do not own television sets are
less likely to be influenced in their purchasing
decisions by television advertising than are
consumers who own television sets.

(B) Subscriptions to cable television include access
to some public-television channels, which do not
accept advertising.

(C) For locations with poor television reception,
cable television provides picture quality superior
to that provided by free television.

(D) There is as much advertising on many cabletelevision
channels as there is on "free"
television channels.

(E) Cable-television subscribers can choose which
channels they wish to receive.

Answer is D... I'm having some trouble grasping the question answers here and the passage itself as well. can someone please break down, in detail, this question for me? Much appreciated thanks all!
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by [email protected] » Sun Feb 12, 2012 7:32 pm
A. Consumers who don't watch TV are irrelevant to the argument.
B. This is doesn't weaken the argument that "free" TV is not free, rather this might stengthen the argument.
C. The picture quality of cable & free TV are not an issue here.
D. This make sense, so cable tv give advertisements in its programs like free television channels so they are same in this sense.... cable tv does not have this advantage
E. Irrelevant
Join the discussion

by factor26 » Mon Feb 13, 2012 4:52 pm
thank you for your insight - but can someone explain the question with a little more detail?
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Mon Sep 10, 2012 8:08 am
but can someone explain the question with a little more detail?
I'm having some trouble grasping the question answers here and the passage itself as well. can someone please break down, in detail, this question for me? Much appreciated thanks all!
Could somebody please help..
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by everything's eventual » Mon Sep 10, 2012 7:10 pm
Hello there....I will try and make it as simple as possible.

Lets discuss the passage first :

The cable-television spokesperson is trying to promote cable television over "free television". He says that " free television" is not really free because consumers end up paying for the costly advertising. Based on this argument, he says that subscriptions to cable - television are a bargain and that consumers should go for them.

Now we have to basically weaken this argument. What comes to your mind first while analyzing this question stem? What if as much advertising is present on cable television as on free television? Then consumers end up paying for the subscriptions as well as for the advertising.

Now scan the options and you will see that D) says exactly that.

We will anyway check all options :

A) - Consumers who do not own television sets are not relevant as they cannot have free television and cannot subscribe to cable TV.

B) - This doesn't do anything to the argument. This option says that there will be access to some public-television channels which do not accept advertising. There is no weakening for sure. If it was a strengthening question then this option could be one candidate.

C) - The spokesperson never used quality of picture in his argument. His argument is based on pricing.

D) - This is the answer.

E) - This option doesnt mention anything about advertising in cable television.

I hope that I have been able to convey my understanding properly.
Join the discussion