Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 1
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 1 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand5 seats leftStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Subjunctive vs infinitive - verb require

Expert replies
by agarwalva » Wed May 16, 2012 2:33 pm
Standard police procedure requires that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together.
(a) Standard police procedure requires that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together
(b) A requirement, according to standard police procedure, is that an officer interview witness separately rather than interviewing them together
(c) Standard police procedure requires an officer to interview witnesses separately rather than to interview them together
(d) It is required in standard police procedure that an officer interviews witnesses separately, not together
(e) Standard police procedure requires that an officer interviews witnesses separately rather than together
OA: A
I thought A has some problem in ellipse and comparision .
I felt C better. whats wrong with C

verb "require" can take subjunctive as well as infinitive
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by Mike@Magoosh » Wed May 16, 2012 3:23 pm
Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this. :)

First of all, FWIW, a blog on the subjunctive.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... ive-tense/

Next, the idiom for the word "require" --- the verb require can either take (a) an infinite, or (b) a "that" clause in the subjunctive. Both are correct, as you say.

Now, to your sentence. I'll only look at (A) and (C)
(A) Standard police procedure requires that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together.

Correct grammatical construction of "require" + "that" + subjunctive.

Also, it's a standard construction to contrast two adjectives or two adverbs directly with "rather than" (or any comparative term) ---
(1) The professor was pompous rather than informative.
(2) It's healthier to eat slowly rather than voraciously.
(3) I view a car more as a means of conveyance than as a symbol of status.
(4) "A custom more honor'd in the breach than in the observance."
(I wrote the first three, but can't take credit for the fourth!)

Here, answer (A) follows this pattern ---

"that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together."

Both "separately" and "together" are adverbs that are properly contrasted by the comparative term. (A) is perfectly correct.

(C) Standard police procedure requires an officer to interview witnesses separately rather than to interview them together

Yuck. This is too wordy and repetitive. Since "separately rather than together" is perfectly acceptable, choosing instead to include all those extra words is, on the GMAT, absolutely unforgivable Concision is pure gold on GMAT SC. That's what's wrong with (C).

Does this make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion

by quriousaddict » Mon May 21, 2012 10:00 am
[quote="Mike@Magoosh"]Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this. :)

First of all, FWIW, a blog on the subjunctive.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... ive-tense/

Next, the idiom for the word "require" --- the verb require can either take (a) an infinite, or (b) a "that" clause in the subjunctive. Both are correct, as you say.

Now, to your sentence. I'll only look at (A) and (C)
(A) [color=blue]Standard police procedure requires that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together.[/color]

Correct grammatical construction of "require" + "that" + subjunctive.

Also, it's a standard construction to contrast two adjectives or two adverbs directly with "rather than" (or any comparative term) ---
(1) The professor was pompous rather than informative.
(2) It's healthier to eat slowly rather than voraciously.
(3) I view a car more as a means of conveyance than as a symbol of status.
(4) "A custom more honor'd in the breach than in the observance."
(I wrote the first three, but can't take credit for the fourth!)

Here, answer (A) follows this pattern ---

"that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together."

Both "separately" and "together" are adverbs that are properly contrasted by the comparative term. (A) is perfectly correct.

(C) [color=blue]Standard police procedure requires an officer to interview witnesses separately rather than to interview them together [/color]

Yuck. This is too wordy and repetitive. Since "separately rather than together" is perfectly acceptable, choosing instead to include all those extra words is, on the GMAT, absolutely unforgivable Concision is pure gold on GMAT SC. That's what's wrong with (C).

Does this make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)[/quote]

Why not C?
"an officer interviews" vs "an officer interview"
Join the discussion

by thestartupguy » Mon May 21, 2012 11:20 am
Mike@Magoosh wrote:Hi, there. I'm happy to help with this. :)

First of all, FWIW, a blog on the subjunctive.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... ive-tense/

Next, the idiom for the word "require" --- the verb require can either take (a) an infinite, or (b) a "that" clause in the subjunctive. Both are correct, as you say.

Now, to your sentence. I'll only look at (A) and (C)
(A) Standard police procedure requires that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together.

Correct grammatical construction of "require" + "that" + subjunctive.

Also, it's a standard construction to contrast two adjectives or two adverbs directly with "rather than" (or any comparative term) ---
(1) The professor was pompous rather than informative.
(2) It's healthier to eat slowly rather than voraciously.
(3) I view a car more as a means of conveyance than as a symbol of status.
(4) "A custom more honor'd in the breach than in the observance."
(I wrote the first three, but can't take credit for the fourth!)

Here, answer (A) follows this pattern ---

"that an officer interview witnesses separately rather than together."

Both "separately" and "together" are adverbs that are properly contrasted by the comparative term. (A) is perfectly correct.

(C) Standard police procedure requires an officer to interview witnesses separately rather than to interview them together

Yuck. This is too wordy and repetitive. Since "separately rather than together" is perfectly acceptable, choosing instead to include all those extra words is, on the GMAT, absolutely unforgivable Concision is pure gold on GMAT SC. That's what's wrong with (C).

Does this make sense? Please let me know if you have any further questions.

Mike :)
Nice explanation Mike! :)
Join the discussion

by Mike@Magoosh » Mon May 21, 2012 11:55 am
quriousaddict wrote:Why not C?
"an officer interviews" vs "an officer interview"
Dear quriousaddict,

I'm happy to answer your question. :)

Once again, the "that" clause following the verb "to require" takes the subjunctive.
"an officer interviews" = present tense, indicative mood (i.e. ordinary everyday speech)
"an officer interview" = present tense, subjunctive mood
The subjunctive is used for hypothetical situations, situations contrary to fact, wishes, desires, requirements, etc. etc. If you are unfamiliar with the subjunctive, I would suggest the blog article to which I linked in my previous post. Here's the link again:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... ive-tense/

Let me know if you have any questions.

Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion