BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Subjunctive Usage

Expert replies
by yvonne0923 » Wed May 11, 2011 9:38 pm
If the biologist was correct, the symbiotic relationship of whales and barnacles is the result of evolution.

A. If the biologist was correct, the symbiotic relationship of
B. Should the biologist be correct, the symbiotic relationship of
C. If the biologist is correct, the relationship that is symbiotic between
D. If the biologist is correct, the symbiotic relationship between
E. Should the biologist have been correct, the symbiotic relationship betweem















___________________________________________________________________________________________________
[spoiler]O.A: D[/spoiler]
I understand that "the relationship between" should be used in this question, but I am confusing about the subjunctive usage of "If", are we supposed to use "If the biologist WERE correct,..." rather than " If the biologist is correct,..."

Thanks,
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by smackmartine » Wed May 11, 2011 10:07 pm
Correct idiom is "relationship between"
A and B out
C looks awkward
Close call between C and D

The non underline portion is in present tense. We do not want to change the tense because there is no such indication.
Option D is better.

Also if you use subjunctive mood, sentence can be rewritten as :

If the biologist WERE correct, the symbiotic relationship between whales and barnacles WOULD BE the result of evolution. (WOULD IS NECESSARY) ---> this sentence could be incorrect but with subjunctive mood "WOULD" is required in the non underline portion.
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Wed May 11, 2011 10:20 pm
smackmartine wrote:Correct idiom is "relationship between"
A and B out
C looks awkward
Close call between C and D

The non underline portion is in present tense. We do not want to change the tense because there is no such indication.
Option D is better.

Also if you use subjunctive mood, sentence can be rewritten as :

If the biologist WERE correct, the symbiotic relationship between whales and barnacles WOULD BE the result of evolution. (WOULD IS NECESSARY) ---> this sentence could be incorrect but with subjunctive mood "WOULD" is required in the non underline portion.
thanks, I am clear now.
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Thu May 12, 2011 3:23 am
yvonne0923 wrote:If the biologist was correct, the symbiotic relationship of whales and barnacles is the result of evolution.

A. If the biologist was correct, the symbiotic relationship of
B. Should the biologist be correct, the symbiotic relationship of
C. If the biologist is correct, the relationship that is symbiotic between
D. If the biologist is correct, the symbiotic relationship between
E. Should the biologist have been correct, the symbiotic relationship betweem















___________________________________________________________________________________________________
[spoiler]O.A: D[/spoiler]
I understand that "the relationship between" should be used in this question, but I am confusing about the subjunctive usage of "If", are we supposed to use "If the biologist WERE correct,..." rather than " If the biologist is correct,..."

Thanks,
Please note the following distinctions:

If the biologist IS correct, the relationship IS the result of evolution.

The sentence above implies that the biologist MIGHT BE correct and that the relationship MIGHT BE the result of evolution (all in the present).

If the biologist WERE correct, the relationship WOULD BE the result of evolution.

The sentence above (which feels awkward) implies that the biologist IS NOT correct and that the relationship IS NOT the result of evolution (all in the present).

If the biologist WAS correct, the relationship WAS the result of evolution.

The sentence above implies that the biologist MIGHT HAVE BEEN correct and that the relationship MIGHT HAVE BEEN the result of evolution (all in the past). This situation is unlikely to be addressed on the GMAT.

If the biologist HAD BEEN correct, the relationship WOULD HAVE BEEN the result of evolution.

The sentence above implies that the biologist WAS NOT correct and that the relationship WAS NOT the result of evolution (all in the past).
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by yvonne0923 » Thu May 12, 2011 11:50 am
GMATGuruNY wrote:
yvonne0923 wrote:If the biologist was correct, the symbiotic relationship of whales and barnacles is the result of evolution.

A. If the biologist was correct, the symbiotic relationship of
B. Should the biologist be correct, the symbiotic relationship of
C. If the biologist is correct, the relationship that is symbiotic between
D. If the biologist is correct, the symbiotic relationship between
E. Should the biologist have been correct, the symbiotic relationship betweem















___________________________________________________________________________________________________
[spoiler]O.A: D[/spoiler]
I understand that "the relationship between" should be used in this question, but I am confusing about the subjunctive usage of "If", are we supposed to use "If the biologist WERE correct,..." rather than " If the biologist is correct,..."

Thanks,
Please note the following distinctions:

If the biologist IS correct, the relationship IS the result of evolution.

The sentence above implies that the biologist MIGHT BE correct and that the relationship MIGHT BE the result of evolution (all in the present).

If the biologist WERE correct, the relationship WOULD BE the result of evolution.

The sentence above (which feels awkward) implies that the biologist IS NOT correct and that the relationship IS NOT the result of evolution (all in the present).

If the biologist WAS correct, the relationship WAS the result of evolution.

The sentence above implies that the biologist MIGHT HAVE BEEN correct and that the relationship MIGHT HAVE BEEN the result of evolution (all in the past). This situation is unlikely to be addressed on the GMAT.

If the biologist HAD BEEN correct, the relationship WOULD HAVE BEEN the result of evolution.

The sentence above implies that the biologist WAS NOT correct and that the relationship WAS NOT the result of evolution (all in the past).
Thanks for the detailed explanation.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1