BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Studies have shown that highway drivers are less likely to

Expert replies
by Mike@Magoosh » Tue Sep 24, 2013 1:44 pm
Studies have shown that highway drivers are less likely to drive at speeds greater than the posted speed limit if houses or buildings are in some way visible from the road. Assuming similar car, road and traffic conditions, highway drivers are more likely to drive at speeds in excess of the posted speed limit if the natural surroundings are not interrupted by buildings. Psychologists hypothesize that seeing signs of civilization reminds drivers of their responsibility to the safety of their fellow humans, thus making them more likely to obey the posted speed limit.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the psychologists' interpretation of the study?

(A) People who live in sparsely populated areas are more likely to buy cars that can drive well in excess of any speed limit.
(B) Highway drivers passing a large plowed and cultivated field are more likely to obey the speed limit than those passing large field of wild flowers.
(C) Traffic tends to be more congested around towns and cities.
(D) Drivers are equally likely to obey the speed limit whether driving past a town with or without tall buildings.
(E) Highway police officers are more densely located close to towns and cities, and therefore most citations for speeding are issued in these locations.


For a discussion of GMAT CR Strengthen the Argument questions, as well as the OA & explanation to this particular question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-cr-st ... -argument/

Mike :-)
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by faraz_jeddah » Tue Sep 24, 2013 10:44 pm
Nice set of questions Mike!

I believe in general Strengthen questions are a bit easier than the notorious Weaken and assumption questions. A blog on those 2 types would be great!
A good question also deserves a Thanks.

Messenger Boy: The Thesselonian you're fighting... he's the biggest man i've ever seen. I wouldn't want to fight him.
Achilles: That's why no-one will remember your name.
Join the discussion

by Mike@Magoosh » Wed Sep 25, 2013 1:25 pm
faraz_jeddah wrote:Nice set of questions Mike!

I believe in general Strengthen questions are a bit easier than the notorious Weaken and assumption questions. A blog on those 2 types would be great!
Dear faraz_jeddah,
Ask, and you shall receive. :-P
Here's a blog about weaken questions.
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/how-to-wea ... reasoning/
Here's a blog on the CR question types overall:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/save-time- ... questions/
I just wrote a blog about Assumption questions --- that article will go live on the blog in about a week, but until then, I have attached a pdf of the article.
I hope all this helps.
Mike :-)
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
https://gmat.magoosh.com/
Join the discussion

by faraz_jeddah » Fri Sep 27, 2013 10:05 am
gracias!
A good question also deserves a Thanks.

Messenger Boy: The Thesselonian you're fighting... he's the biggest man i've ever seen. I wouldn't want to fight him.
Achilles: That's why no-one will remember your name.
Join the discussion

by fourteenstix » Fri Sep 27, 2013 11:03 am
The psychologists conclusion: signs of civilization remind drivers of their responsibility to slow down.

A. Does not strengthen. The conclusion has nothing to do with the ability of the cars; rather, it focuses on the human response to signs of civilization.

B. Bingo. A cultivated field is a sign of civilization and produces slower driving. The field of flowers lacks that sign, and thus fails to produce a cautionary response.

C. This is not about the human response to signs of civilization, but minutia about traffic. Doesn't strengthen.

D. We're not concerned with whether the buildings are tall or not. Although seeing the buildings (signs of civilization) produces the desired result (slowing down), we're not trying to differentiate between the signs of civilization. We're trying to differentiate between signs of civilization and the LACK of signs of civilization. Not this one.

E. Speeding where signs of civilization are abundant would weaken the psychologists hypothesis.
Mike@Magoosh wrote:Studies have shown that highway drivers are less likely to drive at speeds greater than the posted speed limit if houses or buildings are in some way visible from the road. Assuming similar car, road and traffic conditions, highway drivers are more likely to drive at speeds in excess of the posted speed limit if the natural surroundings are not interrupted by buildings. Psychologists hypothesize that seeing signs of civilization reminds drivers of their responsibility to the safety of their fellow humans, thus making them more likely to obey the posted speed limit.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the psychologists' interpretation of the study?

(A) People who live in sparsely populated areas are more likely to buy cars that can drive well in excess of any speed limit.
(B) Highway drivers passing a large plowed and cultivated field are more likely to obey the speed limit than those passing large field of wild flowers.
(C) Traffic tends to be more congested around towns and cities.
(D) Drivers are equally likely to obey the speed limit whether driving past a town with or without tall buildings.
(E) Highway police officers are more densely located close to towns and cities, and therefore most citations for speeding are issued in these locations.


For a discussion of GMAT CR Strengthen the Argument questions, as well as the OA & explanation to this particular question, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/gmat-cr-st ... -argument/

Mike :-)
Join the discussion