BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

strongest object

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:06 am
Thanked: 6 times
by gmatnmein2010 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:43 pm
It is better for the environment if as much of all packaging as possible is made from materials that are biodegradable in landfills. Therefore, it is always a change for the worse to replace packaging made from paper or cardboard with packaging made from plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills.
Which of the following, if true, constitutes the strongest objection to the argument above?
(A) The paper and cardboard used in packaging are usually not biodegradable in landfills.
(B) Some plastic used in packaging is biodegradable in landfills.
(C) In many landfills, a significant proportion of space is taken up by materials other than discarded packaging materials.
(D) It is impossible to avoid entirely the use of packaging materials that are not biodegradable in landfills.
(E) Sometimes, in packaging an item, plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills are combined with cardboard.
[spoiler]The argument says the change is always worse-- to object this we need to show "no its not always worse rather sometimes it is ok-- for this if we say that sme plastics are biodegradable and therefore using them is some times is good . But as per the OA I am wrng in my reasoning pls help[/spoiler]

source : LSAT
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 777
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:02 amFollowed by: 47 members
Location: Mumbai, India
Thanked: 117 times

by komal » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:59 pm
It is better for the environment if as much of all packaging as possible is made from materials that are biodegradable in landfills. Therefore, it is always a change for the worse to replace packaging made from paper or cardboard with packaging made from plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills.

Which of the following, if true, constitutes the strongest objection to the argument above?

The author's conclusion :
Packaging made from biodegradable materials (paper or cardboard) = better
Packaging made from plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills = worse

We can weaken the argument if we can show either one of the above or both are not true. Lets see which one does that for us :

(A) The paper and cardboard used in packaging are usually not biodegradable in landfills.
Correct : If paper and cardboard are not BIODEGRADABLE then they are not better. This statement undermines the author's conclusion significantly.

(B) Some plastic used in packaging is biodegradable in landfills.
Incorrect : Does nothing to undermine the conclusion.

(C) In many landfills, a significant proportion of space is taken up by materials other than discarded packaging materials.
Incorrect : SPACE in landfills is not an issue here. Eliminated.

(D) It is impossible to avoid entirely the use of packaging materials that are not biodegradable in landfills.
Incorrect : IMPOSSIBLE is an extreme word here. Eliminated.

(E) Sometimes, in packaging an item, plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills are combined with cardboard.
Incorrect : PLASTIC is PLASTIC... whether adulterated or not .... it is still not BIODEGRADABLE.
_________________
Last edited by komal on Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1560
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 2:38 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 137 times

by thephoenix » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:03 pm
gmatnmein2010 wrote:It is better for the environment if as much of all packaging as possible is made from materials that are biodegradable in landfills. Therefore, it is always a change for the worse to replace packaging made from paper or cardboard with packaging made from plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills.
Which of the following, if true, constitutes the strongest objection to the argument above?
(A) The paper and cardboard used in packaging are usually not biodegradable in landfills.
(B) Some plastic used in packaging is biodegradable in landfills.
(C) In many landfills, a significant proportion of space is taken up by materials other than discarded packaging materials.
(D) It is impossible to avoid entirely the use of packaging materials that are not biodegradable in landfills.
(E) Sometimes, in packaging an item, plastics that are not biodegradable in landfills are combined with cardboard.
[spoiler]The argument says the change is always worse-- to object this we need to show "no its not always worse rather sometimes it is ok-- for this if we say that sme plastics are biodegradable and therefore using them is some times is good . But as per the OA I am wrng in my reasoning pls help[/spoiler]

source : LSAT
IMO A
here the author is assuming that packaging made from paper or cardboard is a biodegradable in landfills
to object it A tells straight away that its not biodegradable in landfills.

however the word SOME is making it a weak contender for correct ans over A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 185
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 3:06 am
Thanked: 6 times

by gmatnmein2010 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:17 am
thephoenix wrote: IMO A
here the author is assuming that packaging made from paper or cardboard is a biodegradable in landfills
to object it A tells straight away that its not biodegradable in landfills.

however the word SOME is making it a weak contender for correct ans over A
@thephoenix
can u elaborate this part
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 758
Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 9:32 pmFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Bangalore,India
Thanked: 67 times

by sumanr84 » Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:33 am
I choose A too.

(A) The paper and cardboard used in packaging are usually not biodegradable in landfills.
-- usually not biodegradable is better contender

(B) Some plastic used in packaging is biodegradable in landfills.
-- Some, if we change the wording from some to most, then it wud also become strong contender.
I am on a break !!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Hyderabad
Thanked: 12 times

by vijay_venky » Thu Feb 11, 2010 2:52 am
P1. better for environment if as much as packaging is done in materials bio-degradable in land-fills.
Conclusion- Therefore, packaging in plastics replacing packaging in paper or cardboard is always a change for worse.

Now the premise should be leading to the conclusion, so in effect, the argument is that 'because bio-degradable in landfills are better, the change is always worse'.

The assumption is that paper and cardboard are bio-degradable in landfills.

And we are looking for the strongest objection, so if we have a look at A and B, A would be a strong objection because of the word usually. And if we observe, the stimulus clearly mentions that we are talking only about non-biodegradable plastics (Essential modifier "that" :) ).so Eliminate B.

My pic is A
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 9:47 pmFollowed by: 2 members

by Nick0203 » Tue Jan 15, 2019 12:01 am
(A) Correct. If paper and cardboard are not biodegradable then they are not better. This statement undermines the author's conclusion significantly.
(B) Does nothing to undermine the conclusion.
(C) Space in landfills is not an issue here. Eliminated.
(D) Impossible is an extreme word here. Eliminated.
(E) Plastic, whether adulterated or not, it is still not biodegradable
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1