BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Strengthen question..

Expert replies
by rahulg83 » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:24 am
In the early 1970's, when art reached its current high levels of popularity and value, a rash of thefts of works by great artists occurred in major art museums around the world. But, after 1975, sophisticated new security systems were installed in every major museum. As a consequence, important thefts in major museum declined markedly.

Which of the following, if true, is strongest if offered as part of evidence to show that improved security systems were responsible for the decline in thefts of important works from major museums?

A) The typical art work stolen during both the 1970's and 1980's was a small piece of that could be concealed on a person of the thief.
B) Premiums paid by major museums to insure their most important works of art increased considerably between 1975 and 1985.
C) The prices paid to art thieves for stolen works were lower during the 1980's than the prices paid to art thieves for comparable works during the 1970's.
D) Thefts from private collections and smaller galleries of works by great artists increased sharply starting in the late 1970's.
E) Art thefts in Europe, which has the largest number of works by great artists, outnumbered art thefts in United States during the 1980's.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Arsene Lupin » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:01 pm
I'd go with A because it removes one other possibility.

The other choices either weaken or are irrelevant.
Join the discussion

by rohan_vus » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:09 pm
My Take ..IMO D .. whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:14 pm
Arsene Lupin wrote:I'd go with A because it removes one other possibility.

The other choices either weaken or are irrelevant.
which option is it killing?

i will also go with D as theft in other gallary(small nd private means likely not having the security systems...)...it cancels on one possibility is not because of reduction in general in all kind of thefts...
Charged up again to beat the beast :)
Join the discussion

by Arsene Lupin » Sat Jun 13, 2009 12:20 pm
maihuna wrote:
Arsene Lupin wrote:I'd go with A because it removes one other possibility.

The other choices either weaken or are irrelevant.
which option is it k!II!ng?

i will also go with D as theft in other gallary(small nd private means likely not having the security systems...)...it cancels on one possibility is not because of reduction in general in all kind of thefts...
"A" pretty much tells us that art size is not a reason because it remained the same.

On a second thought, "D" seems way stronger!

It is sad to see two options strengthening :(

I don't think this is from the official guide. What is the source of this question mate?
Join the discussion

by ket » Sat Jun 13, 2009 1:31 pm
Ppl I don't like ANY of the answers :) none of them sound logical to me...

D too seems weird, if the thefts from private collection increased, how does this prove that the security at major museums was effective? how can we assume that security systems were not also installed by the owners of private collections... I don't like this answer, there is no real link.

A - also not logical, OK the size was the same... so what? can we say that 'if the size of things stolen was the same then most probably the security was effective?' I guess no...

Other answers actually weaken the effectiveness of security.

To me this question sounds very wrong.Would be great to know source and OA ....
Join the discussion

by schumi_gmat » Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:01 pm
IMO D.

Question tells that major museum has security system and so there was increase in the thefts in private galleries. This reinforces the conclusion

Arsene Lupin wrote:
I'd go with A because it removes one other possibility.

The other choices either weaken or are irrelevant.


which option is it k!II!ng?

i will also go with D as theft in other gallary(small nd private means likely not having the security systems...)...it cancels on one possibility is not because of reduction in general in all kind of thefts...
_________________
How does this eliminate alternate possibility? What are the other possibilities that are eliminated due to this choice?

A is eliminated becuase the period is from 1970 to 1980 but security system were installed in 1975. Also Size is irrelevant.
Join the discussion

by rahulg83 » Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:44 pm
OA is D, source is one of the paper tests that i have (Sadly, i don't know whether these tests are official or not, but having good questions, but again, with no explanations :cry: )
I don't know why i chose C at first place :x , pretty illogical. D seems better than others on second thoughts.
Join the discussion

by Arsene Lupin » Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:17 pm
A - also not logical, OK the size was the same... so what? can we say that 'if the size of things stolen was the same then most probably the security was effective?' I guess no...
It does strengthen, yes. It is one of the rules in PowerScore CR Bible.

Removing a weakening possibility = Strengthening

The argument says X caused Y. If one of the choices say "Z didn't cause Y", then this choice is strengthening the argument. And this rule fits A perfectly.

This is why it is usually preferred to study the Verbal part only from the official guide. :cry:
Join the discussion

by khanshainur » Sun May 15, 2016 10:33 pm
I think D is the best in this case
Join the discussion