BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Strengthen Question

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: NJ, USA
Thanked: 1 times
by csandeepreddy » Sat Sep 20, 2008 1:19 pm
Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont’s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont’s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay
for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont’s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont’s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:57 am
Thanked: 3 times

by abhi75 » Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:21 pm
The answer is D.

D strengthens the underlying assumption that the average pay for the jobs eliminated is equal to the avg of the jobs citywide.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 3:29 amFollowed by: 5 members
Location: Australia
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:760

by Indradeep » Sat Sep 20, 2008 10:51 pm
It should be D because new jobs avg. pay > jobs citywide. Now if eliminated jobs > jobs citywide, there is a prob.
So eliminated jobs <= jobs citywide
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 9:40 am
Thanked: 3 times

by crak.gmat » Sun Sep 21, 2008 12:08 pm
IMO A, whats the OA?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 871
Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 7:48 am
Thanked: 48 times

by stop@800 » Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:37 pm
A: We are not talking within Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
c: Created jobs have been elimintaed, this can not stregthen.
E: Suburbs is completely oiut of question so I think it can not be the answer

Answer is either D or B
My preference is for D but I am not abel to rule out B.

B actually justifies that Mayor Delmont’s tenure caused the increase.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 8:23 am
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 2 times

by banker1 » Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:50 pm
stop@800 wrote:A: We are not talking within Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
c: Created jobs have been elimintaed, this can not stregthen.
E: Suburbs is completely oiut of question so I think it can not be the answer

Answer is either D or B
My preference is for D but I am not abel to rule out B.

B actually justifies that Mayor Delmont’s tenure caused the increase.
I eliminated (A), (C), and (E). They all seem out of scope.

I'm stuck between (B) and (D) and am leaning toward (B) as well (although (B) seems too straightforward...).

I interpreted the Mayor's advertisement to be something like: "Others complain about job loss under my watch. Not only did I create more jobs than jobs were lost, but the jobs I created were worth more than existing jobs in the city."

The conclusion states during the Mayor's tenure paychecks increased. Average pay at a 10 year low seems to support the conclusion that paychecks have increased.

(D) seems to reference job elimination during the Mayor's tenure, not job creation...

What is the OA?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 9:49 pm
Location: NJ, USA
Thanked: 1 times

by csandeepreddy » Sun Sep 21, 2008 8:10 pm
The OA is D
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 8:40 pm
Thanked: 7 times

by kris610 » Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:18 pm
stop@800 wrote:A: We are not talking within Mayor Delmont’s tenure.
c: Created jobs have been elimintaed, this can not stregthen.
E: Suburbs is completely oiut of question so I think it can not be the answer

Answer is either D or B
My preference is for D but I am not abel to rule out B.

B actually justifies that Mayor Delmont’s tenure caused the increase.
You are right, but the argument's conclusion is that "The average paycheck has been steadily getting bigger". Only D strongly supports this.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pmFollowed by: 1906 members
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Dec 31, 2015 10:43 pm
csandeepreddy wrote:Political Advertisement:
Mayor Delmont�s critics complain about the jobs that were lost in the city under Delmont�s leadership. Yet the fact is that not only were more jobs created than were eliminated, but the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay
for jobs citywide every year since Delmont took office. So there can be no question that throughout Delmont�s tenure the average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument in the advertisement?

A. The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont�s tenure.
B. Average pay in the city was at a ten-year low when Mayor Delmont took office.
C. Some of the jobs created in the city during Mayor Delmont�s tenure have in the meantime been eliminated again.
D. The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont�s tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
E. The average pay for jobs in the city is currently higher than it is for jobs in the suburbs surrounding the city.
I received a PM requesting that I comment about answer choices A and D.

Premise: More jobs were created than were eliminated, and the average pay for these new jobs has been higher than the average pay for jobs citywide.
Conclusion: The average paycheck in this city has been getting steadily bigger.

The following case satisfies all of the constraints in the premise:
100 jobs that pay $11 per hour have been created.
Average pay for all jobs citywide is $10 per hour.
99 jobs that pay $10,000 per hour have been eliminated.
In this case, the average paycheck would likely be LOWER, since so many high-paying jobs have been eliminated.

One way to strengthen the conclusion is to RULE OUT the bad case above.
Answer choice D does just that:
The average pay for jobs eliminated in the city during Mayor Delmont's tenure has been roughly equal every year to the average pay for jobs citywide.
Here, the eliminated jobs are NOT high-paying, strengthening the conclusion that the creation of jobs with higher-than-average pay has lead to bigger paychecks for the average worker.

The correct answer is D.

A: The average pay for jobs created in the city during the past three years was higher than the average pay for jobs created in the city earlier in Mayor Delmont's tenure.
This option seems to strengthen the PREMISE that the average pay for new jobs has been high.
A premise is a FACT; it cannot be strengthened.
The correct answer choice must strengthen the CONCLUSION.
Eliminate A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1