BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Strategy for BOLD FACE questions ? Anyone? - MGMAT TOUGHIE

Expert replies
by kaps786 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:32 am
Microeconomist: Usually, the relationship between the price of a good and the demand for that product is negative: when the price goes up, the quantity demanded goes down, and vice versa[/size]. However, a dramatic increase in the price of basic foods, such as bread or milk, is likely to increase rather then decrease their consumption among the low-income households. Since the consumption of these products is relatively stable, an increase in their price will simply lower the proportion of the household's budget spent on other, more expensive food items, such as meat or fish. In an effort to maintain the same calorie intake, the household will consume even more of the basic foods that typically remain a cheaper way to satisfy hunger even after an increase in their prices.

In the argument above, which of the following statements best describes the role played by each portion in boldface?


The first is evidence that the microeconomist provides in support of a certain prediction; the second is that prediction.


The first is a generalization that the microeconomist accepts as true; the second is a consequence that follows from that generalization.

The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the microeconomist predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.


The first acknowledges a consideration against the main conclusion of the microeconomist; the second is that conclusion.


The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the microeconomist predicts will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.[/size]


OA follows...







OA is C


Can anyone offer any tips and an approach for solving bold face questions. This seems to be a more relatively new area of GMAT and I dont see a whole lot of material by any test prep companies either to handles these kind of questions.

I am getting all my questions wrong.

Any resource material, that you can recommend for learning this will also be useful.

Please help.![/size][/size]
Last edited by kaps786 on Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by garima99 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:35 am
which one's are bold?
Join the discussion

by garima99 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:42 am
Microeconomist: Usually, the relationship between the price of a good and the demand for that product is negative: when the price goes up, the quantity demanded goes down, and vice versa[/size]. However, a dramatic increase in the price of basic foods, such as bread or milk, is likely to increase rather then decrease their consumption among the low-income households. Since the consumption of these products is relatively stable, an increase in their price will simply lower the proportion of the household's budget spent on other, more expensive food items, such as meat or fish. In an effort to maintain the same calorie intake, the household will consume even more of the basic foods that typically remain a cheaper way to satisfy hunger even after an increase in their prices.


The first statement is conclusion and the second statement is the explanation for counter conclusion..
Join the discussion

by garima99 » Fri Aug 19, 2011 2:46 am
kaps786 wrote:Microeconomist: Usually, the relationship between the price of a good and the demand for that product is negative: when the price goes up, the quantity demanded goes down, and vice versa[/size]. However, a dramatic increase in the price of basic foods, such as bread or milk, is likely to increase rather then decrease their consumption among the low-income households. Since the consumption of these products is relatively stable, an increase in their price will simply lower the proportion of the household's budget spent on other, more expensive food items, such as meat or fish. In an effort to maintain the same calorie intake, the household will consume even more of the basic foods that typically remain a cheaper way to satisfy hunger even after an increase in their prices.

In the argument above, which of the following statements best describes the role played by each portion in boldface?


The first is evidence that the microeconomist provides in support of a certain prediction; the second is that prediction.- the first is not an evidence..Eliminate


The first is a generalization that the microeconomist accepts as true; the second is a consequence that follows from that generalization. first and second are not saying the same thing.Eliminate

The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the microeconomist predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.


The first acknowledges a consideration against the main conclusion of the microeconomist; the second is that conclusion.-second is not a conclusion but only support for counter conclusion.Eliminate


The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the microeconomist predicts will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.- The microeconomist are not saying that this is repeated[/size]


OA follows...







OA is C


Can anyone offer any tips and an approach for solving bold face questions. This seems to be a more relatively new area of GMAT and I dont see a whole lot of material by any test prep companies either to handles these kind of questions.

I am getting all my questions wrong.

Any resource material, that you can recommend for learning this will also be useful.

Please help.![/size][/size]
Join the discussion