BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Strategy advice??

Expert replies
by sashasoro » Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:04 pm
Hi guys,

Thank you, Eric, for this forum, it is very helpful and loaded with resources. I'm hoping to get some tips from the wonderful contributors about where to put my study time - quant or verbal.

I just took my first GMATPrep test and scored 720, 48Q and 41V. Now I know the score sounds good, but I didn't do the AWA (so an hour less exhausted) and I get super nervous in test rooms (took the GRE 3 times, I would know!).

At first it looked to me like my Quant was stronger because of the higher "raw" score, but when I looked up the percentiles, it says 48Q is 83rd percentile and 41V is 92nd percentile. So does that mean my verbal is actually stronger?? Which area should I concentrate in to get the biggest score increase for my time?

During the test, the math seemed quite difficult and I had to guess at the end whereas I finished the verbal with 15 minutes remaining. In quant, it was the concept mixtures that threw me for a loop; in verbal I had a thoroughly bad time with RC, though got some SC wrong as well. So there are many things I can improve in, but I'm afraid to exhaust myself. Where would you recommend to focus?

Thanks for any ideas!
Join the discussion
Source: — GMAT Strategy |

by DanaJ » Mon Feb 22, 2010 11:59 pm
A 720 is a great score... You are definitely on the right track to success.

Indeed, the percentile rankings of the two scores are "reversed". Since it's these percentile rankings that ultimately count, I think you should probably focus on quant. This is especially true since you had 15 minutes to spare at the end of verbal, which means that you could probably slow down a bit, but focus better on the task and get a better score.
Join the discussion

by sashasoro » Tue Feb 23, 2010 5:44 pm
Hi Dana,

Really appreciate the help. I find the scoring extremely fuzzy and misleading at times, so thank very much for clarifying it.

Thank you,
sashasoro
Join the discussion