Each employee on a certain task force is either a manager or a director. What percent of the employees on the task force
are directors?

(1) The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the managers on the task force is $5,000 less than the average salary of all
employees on the task force.
(2) The average (arithmetic mean) salary of the directors on the task force is $15,000 greater than the average salary of all
employees on the task force.

Clearly, neither statement on its own is sufficient.
The two statements combined constitute a MIXTURE problem: two ingredients (managers and directors) are combined to form a mixture (all of the employees on the task force).
To evaluate the two statements combined, use ALLIGATION -- a great way to handle mixture problems.

Let M = managers, D = directors, and T = the entire task force.

Step 1: Draw a number line, with the two ingredients (M and D) on the ends and the mixture (T) in the middle:
M---------------T---------------D

Step 2: Calculate the distances between the averages.
Since the managers' average is 5000 less than the average of the entire task force, and the directors' average is 15,000 more than the average of the entire task force, we get the following distances between the averages:
M-----5000------T----15000------D

Step 3: Determine the ratio in the mixture.
The ratio of M to D in the mixture is the RECIPROCAL of the distances in red.
M : D = 15000:5000 = 3:1.

Since M : D = 3:1, there are 3 managers for every 1 director.
Thus, of every 4 employees, 1 is a director, implying that directors/total = 1/4 = 25%.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.

For two other problems solved with alligation, check here:

https://www.beatthegmat.com/ratios-fract ... 15365.html

I could not understand the logic behind

Step 3: Determine the ratio in the mixture.
The ratio of M to D in the mixture is the RECIPROCAL of the distances in red.
M : D = 15000:5000 = 3:1.

Where did we derive that the ratio has to be reciprocal. Why is this the case?? :!: :

singhmaharaj wrote:I could not understand the logic behind

Step 3: Determine the ratio in the mixture.
The ratio of M to D in the mixture is the RECIPROCAL of the distances in red.
M : D = 15000:5000 = 3:1.

Where did we derive that the ratio has to be reciprocal. Why is this the case?? :!: :

Let's say that the average salary for the entire task force is $30,000, implying the following values:
Average salary for the managers = 30,000 - 5000 = 25,000.
Average salary for the directors = 30,000 + 15,000 = 45,000.
Average salary for the MIXTURE of managers and directors = 30,000.

Resulting number line (plotted as in my post above):
M 25000---5000---30000----------15000----------45000 D

Notice that the average for the mixture (30000) is CLOSER to the average for the managers (25000) than to the average for the directors (45000).
Implication:
There are MORE MANAGERS than directors.
Put another way:
The relatively SMALL distance between the managers' average and the mixture's average implies that the managers constitute a GREATER PROPORTION of the mixture.
Since LESS DISTANCE implies a GREATER PROPORTION of the mixture, the ratio of M to D in the mixture is the RECIPROCAL of the distances in red:
M : D = 15000:5000 = 3:1.