BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

station wagon

Expert replies
by gmat009 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 6:37 pm
Due to the fact that Jordan wrecked Bono's station wagon during a road trip last summer, she has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive her father's car.

(A) has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive
(B) has not been allowed to drive and probably never will be allowed to drive
(C) has not and probably never would be allowed to drive
(D) has not and probably will never be allowed to drive
(E) has not and probably never will be allowed to drive

Plz. explain .........
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by parallel_chase » Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:38 pm
IMO E.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by msvmuthu » Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:42 pm
I guess it is a correctly formed sentence.

she has not been and probably never would be allowed to drive her father's car.

when you split the action still happening and the hypothesis:
she has not been allowed to drive
probably never would be allowed to drive

both are good enough and clear.


(B) is redundant
(C) been is required (still happening)
(D) been is required (still happening)
(E) been is required (still happening)

OA?
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Fri Oct 17, 2008 11:53 pm
One and Only (B)
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:29 am
Bidisha800 wrote:One and Only (B)
OA is B. Can you plz. explain why you chose B
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:38 am
has not been X and will never be Y.

B
Join the discussion

by gmat009 » Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:41 am
4meonly wrote:has not been X and will never be Y.

B
Thanks
Join the discussion

by moneyman » Sat Oct 18, 2008 9:48 am
has not been X and will never be Y.


but choice B says "has not been and never will" it does not say "will never be"

Correct me if Im wrong
Maxx
Join the discussion

by mals24 » Sat Oct 18, 2008 10:03 am
A: probably and would are redundant. They both denote uncertainties. Also we need future tense 'will' and not the past tense 'would'

B: Correct: 'not been allowed to drive' and 'never will be allowed to drive 'are parallel

C, D and E have a common problem. 'Has not....be allowed to drive does not make sense'

We have to break both parts of the sentence 'has not' and 'never will be' and connect it with 'be allowed to drive' and see if both the parts separately make sense.
Join the discussion

by niraj_a » Mon Oct 20, 2008 7:31 am
damn idiom
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1