BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

statements of labor leaders

Expert replies
by taposh_dr » Mon Feb 15, 2010 1:50 pm
Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing
America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the
productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic
pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an
unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further
increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing,
management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its
growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of
workers.
Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical
weakness in the argument above?
(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie
allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders
will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the
absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people,
not with the problems faced by management.
(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors-such as
foreign competition-beyond the control of American workers.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by komal » Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:08 pm
taposh_dr wrote:Contrary to the statements of labor leaders, the central economic problem facing America today is not the distribution of wealth. It is productivity. With the productivity of U.S. industry stagnant, or even declining slightly, the economic pie is no longer growing. Labor leaders, of course, point to what they consider an unfair distribution of the slices of pie to justify their demands for further increases in wages and benefits. And in the past, when the pie was still growing, management could afford to acquiesce. No longer. Until productivity resumes its growth, there can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.

Which of the following statements by a labor leader focuses on the logical weakness in the argument above?

Conclusion : There can be no justification for further increases in the compensation of workers.

(A) Although the economic pie is no longer growing, the portion of the pie allocated to American workers remains unjustly small.
Correct : We arrived at this answer choice by POE.

(B) If management fails to accommodate the demands of workers, labor leaders will be forced to call strikes that will cripple the operation of industry.
Incorrect : If the operation of industry is crippled it will decrease the pie for workers as well as companies.

(C) Although productivity is stagnant, the U.S. population is growing, so that the absolute size of the economic pie continues to grow as well.
Incorrect : Does nothing to attack the conclusion.

(D) As a labor leader, I can be concerned only with the needs of working people, not with the problems faced by management.
Incorrect : This is irrelevant to the scope of the argument.

(E) The stagnation of U.S. industry has been caused largely by factors-such as foreign competition-beyond the control of American workers.
Incorrect : It does not talk about wages. Eliminated.

Join the discussion

by paddle_sweep » Sun May 02, 2010 5:10 am
I had narrowed it down to 'E'.

Could you please explain as to why 'A' is the correct answer?
Join the discussion