BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

State Revenues

Expert replies
by ankit1383 » Sun Jan 04, 2009 12:38 am
State revenues from the corporate income tax are seriously threatened by the new trend towards decentralization of corporate headquarters. Many of the companies leaving the city and its extensive public transportation system are finding it necessary to import costly executive helicopters to transport personnel to and from isolated locations in the suburbs. Because money spent on these helicopters is deductible from gross corporate income as an expense of doing business, such companies will thus pay lower taxes to the state. We must apply appropriate economic sanctions to avoid the loss of these much-needed tax revenues.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the reasoning on which the argument depends?

a. Higher personnel transport costs are offset by other savings at the new corporate headquarters.
b. Tax revenues lost from corporations leaving the state will exceed those gained if sanctions are imposed
c. Increased taxes are paid by helicopter manufacturers as a result of booming business.
d. Business executives prefer the convenience of rapid helicopter travel.
e. There are other economic difficulties for cities caused by corporate relocations to suburbs.

How do we negate choice A......i answered rightly but confused regarding choice A
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by ronniecoleman » Sun Jan 04, 2009 2:20 am
conclusion: we must apply sanctions to regain the taxes...
now lets weaken the reasoning....

Govt wants to regain the lost tax ...that is spent in helicopters..or shown

option A is not well written

use POE to get to A
Admission champion, Hauz khaz
011-27565856
Join the discussion

by maihuna » Sun Jan 04, 2009 5:25 am
applying any mechanical process will lead to such scenario. A in fact is against one of the main premises or conclusion itself that revenue is not lost it same only as increased one like this is somehow offset with some other expenses...

B is weakening the conclusion: If u sanction the gained revenue is less than the business affected...so B clearly weaken the conclusion
Join the discussion

Re: State Revenues

by acecoolan » Sun Jan 04, 2009 4:52 pm
ankit1383 wrote:State revenues from the corporate income tax are seriously threatened by the new trend towards decentralization of corporate headquarters. Many of the companies leaving the city and its extensive public transportation system are finding it necessary to import costly executive helicopters to transport personnel to and from isolated locations in the suburbs. Because money spent on these helicopters is deductible from gross corporate income as an expense of doing business, such companies will thus pay lower taxes to the state. We must apply appropriate economic sanctions to avoid the loss of these much-needed tax revenues.
Which of the following, if true, most weakens the reasoning on which the argument depends?

a. Higher personnel transport costs are offset by other savings at the new corporate headquarters.
b. Tax revenues lost from corporations leaving the state will exceed those gained if sanctions are imposed
c. Increased taxes are paid by helicopter manufacturers as a result of booming business.
d. Business executives prefer the convenience of rapid helicopter travel.
e. There are other economic difficulties for cities caused by corporate relocations to suburbs.

How do we negate choice A......i answered rightly but confused regarding choice A
Whats the OA?
'A' doesn't seem to weaken the conclusion ...

B and C look more appropriate and of these I would choose 'C' since that speaks about an alternate source of tax revenues

-A
Join the discussion

by naveen.bobbili » Mon Jan 05, 2009 2:21 am
IMO C
Alternate source of tax revenue.
GMAT:580
Join the discussion

by Bidisha800 » Fri Jan 09, 2009 10:25 pm
(C) is clear, concise and correct
Drill baby drill !

GMATPowerPrep Test1= 740
GMATPowerPrep Test2= 760
Kaplan Diagnostic Test= 700
Kaplan Test1=600
Kalplan Test2=670
Kalplan Test3=570
Join the discussion

by Brad.C » Fri May 13, 2016 1:49 pm
I'm pretty confident that C is correct answer
Join the discussion