Stars

harsh.champ wrote:The enormous distances between stars are not spaces entirely devoid of matter. The interstellar spaces are filled with 'dust': very low density matter. This miniscule amount of matter, spread over almost infinite distances, acts like a curtain obscuring the stars that lie behind. If it were not for this material we would see no dark patches in the sky at night: the sky would be entirely covered with stars.

The two parts in boldface play what roles in the argument above?

BF 1 : The distance between stars have spaces and spaces is filled with some material.
BF 2 : sky would be full of stars if the spaces between stars were not filled with some material.

Paraphrase : the author presents a fact in bf 1 and in bf2 tells us what would happen if the fact in b1 is not true.

A. The first is a suggestion that the author wishes to dispute. The second is hypothesis that the author wishes to explain.
Incorrect : bf 1 is NOT a suggestion. Eliminated.

B. The first is the main point the author wishes to make. The second is a hypothetical result of accepting that point.
Incorrect : The author has only stated a fact in bf1. He does not wish to make any point here.

C. The first is a fact that the author thinks is important in explaining a certain phenomenon. The second is a result that the author would expect if that fact were not true.
Correct : This correctly restates our paraphrase above.

D. The first is a speculation that the author wishes to justify. The second is a consequence that would result if that speculation is not true.
Incorrect : bf1 is certainly not a speculation.

E. The first is an established fact that the author wishes to explain. The second is a consequence of accepting this fact.
Incorrect : bf 2 is not a consequence of accepting the fact stated in bf 1.

harsh.champ wrote:The enormous distances between stars are not spaces entirely devoid of matter. The interstellar spaces are filled with 'dust': very low density matter. This miniscule amount of matter, spread over almost infinite distances, acts like a curtain obscuring the stars that lie behind. If it were not for this material we would see no dark patches in the sky at night: the sky would be entirely covered with stars.

The two parts in boldface play what roles in the argument above?

A. The first is a suggestion that the author wishes to dispute. The second is hypothesis that the author wishes to explain.
B. The first is the main point the author wishes to make. The second is a hypothetical result of accepting that point.
C. The first is a fact that the author thinks is important in explaining a certain phenomenon. The second is a result that the author would expect if that fact were not true.
D. The first is a speculation that the author wishes to justify. The second is a consequence that would result if that speculation is not true.
E. The first is an established fact that the author wishes to explain. The second is a consequence of accepting this fact.