BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

standardized math and English tests

Expert replies
by NSNguyen » Mon Aug 04, 2008 8:18 am
In 1981, for the first time in over two decades, the average scores of high school students on standardized math and English tests did not decline. During the same year, millions of American students enjoyed their first exposure to the new world of the microcomputer, whether in schools, video arcades, or other settings. The conclusion is clear: far from stultifying the intellectual capacities of students, exposure to computers can actually enhance them.
The most serious weakness of the argument above is its failure to
(A) discuss the underlying causes of the twenty-year decline in students’ test scores
(B) cite specific figures documenting the increases in test scores
(C) distinguish among the various types of computer being used by high school students
(D) define the intellectual capacities tested by the standardized math and English tests referred to
(E) explain exactly how high school students’ abilities on math and English tests could have been enhanced by exposure to computers
Please share your idea and your reasoning :D
https://bmnmed.com/home/
https://nguyensinguyen.vietnam21.org
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Re: standardized math and English tests

by Sunny22uk » Tue Aug 05, 2008 1:41 pm
NSNguyen wrote:In 1981, for the first time in over two decades, the average scores of high school students on standardized math and English tests did not decline. During the same year, millions of American students enjoyed their first exposure to the new world of the microcomputer, whether in schools, video arcades, or other settings. The conclusion is clear: far from stultifying the intellectual capacities of students, exposure to computers can actually enhance them.
This argument is a very week argument.The bold line is the conclusion.There are 2 premises on which he conclusion is based:-
1)In 1981, for the first time in over two decades, the average scores of high school students on standardized math and English tests did not decline.
2) During the same year, millions of American students enjoyed their first exposure to the new world of the microcomputer, whether in schools, video arcades, or other settings
THe most serious weakness in drawing the conclusion is that it doesnot explain the correlation between the scores and introduction of microcomputers.

The answer should be E
Hope it helps
Last edited by Sunny22uk on Wed Aug 06, 2008 8:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to loose sight of the shore.
Join the discussion

by raunekk » Tue Aug 05, 2008 8:30 pm
imo:D
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Wed Aug 06, 2008 1:35 am
IMO E
Join the discussion

by pranavc » Wed Aug 06, 2008 7:23 am
IMO: E
Join the discussion

by some14myself » Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:54 am
guys whats wrong with option D ?!
Join the discussion

by Osirus@VeritasPrep » Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:57 am
some14myself wrote:guys whats wrong with option D ?!
D is wrong mainly because its irrelevant. The intellectual capacities taught before 1981 and after 1981 are the same. What the test measures is not in question or even up for debate. The conclusion is based on computers contributing to scores not declining.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/the-retake-o ... 51414.html

Brandon Dorsey
GMAT Instructor
Veritas Prep

Buy any Veritas Prep book(s) and receive access to 5 Practice Cats for free! Learn More.
Join the discussion

by komal » Fri Feb 05, 2010 9:24 am
NSNguyen wrote:In 1981, for the first time in over two decades, the average scores of high school students on standardized math and English tests did not decline. During the same year, millions of American students enjoyed their first exposure to the new world of the microcomputer, whether in schools, video arcades, or other settings. The conclusion is clear: far from stultifying the intellectual capacities of students, exposure to computers can actually enhance them.
The most serious weakness of the argument above is its failure to

(A) discuss the underlying causes of the twenty-year decline in students� test scores
Incorrect : Issue is not about causes of 20-year decline in score, it is about causes of no decline in scores for the first time in over 20 years

(B) cite specific figures documenting the increases in test scores
Incorrect : Specifying figures is irrelevant to the scope of the argument

(C) distinguish among the various types of computer being used by high school students
Incorrect : What has a PC or a LAPTOP or NOTEBOOK or MACBOOK blah blah blah type of computer got to do with it? Eliminated !!

(D) define the intellectual capacities tested by the standardized math and English tests referred to
Incorrect : Issue here is enhanced intellectual capacities, not definition of intellectual capacities.

(E) explain exactly how high school students� abilities on math and English tests could have been enhanced by exposure to computers
Correct : The argument above fails to explain the ways in which computers could have enhanced the students math and english abilities.
Join the discussion

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 11:12 pm
E seems to be the best choice here
Join the discussion