BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Standard of living

Expert replies
by adi_800 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:48 am
Brunhilda: Economists have predicted that our generation will be the first that cannot confidently look forward to having a better standard of living than that enjoyed by our parents.

Siegfried: That's simply untrue. My father's standard of living is nowhere near as high as his parents' was, and my own standard of living is already higher than that of my parents.

Which of the following best describes the error of reasoning contained in Siegfried's argument above?
A. It relies upon an unreasonable appeal to authority.
B. It assumes the truth of what it sets out to prove.
C. It offers an example that is not inconsistent with Brunhilda's argument.
D. It is based on an unproven speculation about future events.
E. It uses evidence of a correlation to argue the existence of a causal relationship.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by paes » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:51 am
IMO C

Siegfried is trying to object the Brunhilda's view : That's simply untrue

But the given example is actually consistent (not inconsistent ) with Brunhilda's view.
(Brunhilda is also saying the same thing.)
Join the discussion

by selango » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:55 am
Siegfried object B argument by saying that is "simply untrue"

However S offers an example which is same as B argument.

Pick C
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 6:57 am
OE for C:

(C) is incorrect because Siegfried does not offer an example that is aligned with Brunhilda's position. Au contraire, Siegfried offers an example that IS inconsistent with Brunhilda's argument
Join the discussion

by paes » Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:12 am
adi_800 wrote:OE for C:

(C) is incorrect because Siegfried does not offer an example that is aligned with Brunhilda's position. Au contraire, Siegfried offers an example that IS inconsistent with Brunhilda's argument
what is OA then ?
I don't find any other choice near the the answer.
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:17 am
I want few more discussions to happen...
one advice would be to reconsider the choices that you eliminated too easily..

Source kaplan online tests...
Btw..can u solve the oder one frm kaplan....
road repairs...
Join the discussion

by selango » Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:20 am
Is it D?
--Anand--
Join the discussion

by reply2spg » Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:31 am
IMO Brunhilda is trying to prove that current generation is not confident. However, Siegfried says that her father and she is already doing good. Means He/She is trying to say that he/She is already confident.

And that goes good with B. I answered B for this question. But OA is weired. Let Adi post the OA.
Sudhanshu
(have lot of things to learn from all of you)
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 7:42 am
OA is A..
Join the discussion

by prepgmat09 » Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:09 pm
adi_800 wrote:OA is A..
Could you please post the OE ?
Join the discussion

by FightWithGMAT » Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:50 pm
adi_800 wrote:Brunhilda: Economists have predicted that our generation will be the first that cannot confidently look forward to having a better standard of living than that enjoyed by our parents.

Siegfried: That's simply untrue. My father's standard of living is nowhere near as high as his parents' was, and my own standard of living is already higher than that of my parents.

Which of the following best describes the error of reasoning contained in Siegfried's argument above?
A. It relies upon an unreasonable appeal to authority.
B. It assumes the truth of what it sets out to prove.
C. It offers an example that is not inconsistent with Brunhilda's argument.
D. It is based on an unproven speculation about future events.
E. It uses evidence of a correlation to argue the existence of a causal relationship.
Most of us would have seen "example" and "inconsistent" words and immediately marked C.
Even I did that only :)

but yes, NOT inconsistent is the TRAP. First of all, from the tone of both the guys, we can find out that they are not consistent.

Word ECONOMIST is another TRAP. Nowhere, it is mentioned that Siegfried is an ECONOMIST. So, how can he deny other's argument so easily and authoritatively.

Yes, here the case of authority plays its role. A normal person can not argue with (against) a doctor.
Join the discussion