BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

spokesman

Expert replies
by GmatKiss » Sat May 19, 2012 8:29 am
A spokesman for the organization says that Curt Gowdy, who was 86, died from leukemia recently in Palm Beach, Florida.

A spokesman for the organization says that Curt Gowdy, who was 86,
Curt Gowdy, a spokesman for the organization, who was 86,
A spokesman for the organization, who was 86, says that Curt Gowdy
A spokesman for the organization had said Curt Gowdy, who was 86,
A spokesman for the organization says that Curt Gowdy, who was 86, had
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by hailmanyu » Sun May 20, 2012 5:30 am
Answer : A)

A spokesman for the organization says that Curt Gowdy, who was 86,
Curt Gowdy, a spokesman for the organization, who was 86,
(Curt Gowdy is modified incorrectly)
A spokesman for the organization, who was 86, says that Curt Gowdy
(Spokesman is modified incorrectly)
A spokesman for the organization had said Curt Gowdy, who was 86,
(had said and was are not related. If past perfect is used, the simple past must be related to it)
A spokesman for the organization says that Curt Gowdy, who was 86, had
(same reason as D )
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Thu Jan 10, 2013 5:02 am
What is wrong with B?

It changes the meaning of the original sentence but I believe it is grammatically correct.

who does refer to Curt Gowdy as 'who' cant refer to the organization..
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:18 am
sachindia wrote:What is wrong with B?

It changes the meaning of the original sentence but I believe it is grammatically correct.

who does refer to Curt Gowdy as 'who' cant refer to the organization..
Sachindia, you've answered your own question! You're right, B is grammatically correct. So is C! Once you're eliminated the grammatically incorrect answer choices (D and E, because they use unnecessarily complex verb tenses), you must then look to the meaning. Any of these 3 - A, B, or C - could be correct depending on the context. If that's the case, you must default to the original meaning of the sentence, which would be A.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:25 am
Thanks Ceilidh,

Manhattan CAT's explanation says:
(C) This choice also has a modification error that changes the original meaning. Here, the relative clause, "who was 86," describes the spokesman instead of Curt Gowdy. Relative clauses refer to the noun immediately before them.

I guess this explanation is wrong.. 'who was 86' describes Curt who is the spokesman in this sentence..
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

by ceilidh.erickson » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:47 am
In B, both "a spokesman" and the "who" clause are modifying Curt - he was the spokesman, and he was 86. Noun modifiers modify the noun that preceded them.

In C, though, the "who" clause is just modifying the spokesman - that's the noun preceding it. The spokesman is 86, and he said that Curt died. So Curt is not the one being modified, and he's not the spokesman - the spokesman said something about him, so it's clear that they're two different people. The answer explanation given is actually correct.

Does that help?
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
Join the discussion

by sachindia » Thu Jan 10, 2013 7:52 am
Thanks ..
I actually copied the explanation for C instead of B in my earlier post.. The following is what I wanted to mention from Manhattan CAT Explanation..

(B) This choice has a modification error that changes the original meaning. Curt Gowdy was not the spokesman but in this choice the modifying phrase "a spokesman for the organization" refers to him. Modifying phrases must be next to the noun that they modify.


You are right but the above is wrong I believe.
Regards,
Sach
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1