BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Spinal injury CR

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 16 times
by ssgmatter » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:29 am
Wondering if we could have a concrete approach to solve such CR where the argument conclude in a broader sense but starts with a specific evidence....
Attachments
Spinal injury CR.docx
(384.24 KiB) Downloaded 123 times
Best-
Amit
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 33 times

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:41 am
i cant she the problem can u please post in word format
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 16 times

by ssgmatter » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:45 am
dude it is in word doc only...i am able to open here...please try and let me know
Best-
Amit
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times

by adi_800 » Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:43 am
I think the answer is A...
This is defender assumption in which you eliminate that point if raised would go against the argument.

The conclusion of the argument is S handled rakes are better than new rakes for lowering risk of spinal injury. But what if there are other forms that cause injuries as a result of raking. If there are, then the conclusion would be weakened...

Hence A has to be the assumption..
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 46 times

by outreach » Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:57 am
u have posted the document in "docx" format...probably pradeepkaushal9518 wanted the doc to be posted in '.doc' format
ssgmatter wrote:dude it is in word doc only...i am able to open here...please try and let me know
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 46 times

by outreach » Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:22 am
Conclusion:
straight rakes (old) are better than s-shaped rakes (new) for minimizing risk of spinal injury.


Compression injury is implied as the cause of damage of spine. there could be other causes that cause spinal injury Unless other reasons are eliminated we cannot derive the conclusion
A is doing this job by stating that the compression injury is the only cause.
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1