Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 563 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Spinal injury CR

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Subscribe topic
Previous Topic Next Topic
Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 16 times
by ssgmatter » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:29 am
Wondering if we could have a concrete approach to solve such CR where the argument conclude in a broader sense but starts with a specific evidence....
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Best-
Amit
Top
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pmFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 33 times

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:41 am
i cant she the problem can u please post in word format
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 549
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:00 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 16 times

by ssgmatter » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:45 am
dude it is in word doc only...i am able to open here...please try and let me know
Best-
Amit
Top
Join the discussion
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 amFollowed by: 2 members
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times

by adi_800 » Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:43 am
I think the answer is A...
This is defender assumption in which you eliminate that point if raised would go against the argument.

The conclusion of the argument is S handled rakes are better than new rakes for lowering risk of spinal injury. But what if there are other forms that cause injuries as a result of raking. If there are, then the conclusion would be weakened...

Hence A has to be the assumption..
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 46 times

by outreach » Mon Jul 26, 2010 9:57 am
u have posted the document in "docx" format...probably pradeepkaushal9518 wanted the doc to be posted in '.doc' format
ssgmatter wrote:dude it is in word doc only...i am able to open here...please try and let me know
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Top
Join the discussion
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 748
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2010 7:54 amFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 46 times

by outreach » Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:22 am
Conclusion:
straight rakes (old) are better than s-shaped rakes (new) for minimizing risk of spinal injury.


Compression injury is implied as the cause of damage of spine. there could be other causes that cause spinal injury Unless other reasons are eliminated we cannot derive the conclusion
A is doing this job by stating that the compression injury is the only cause.
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Top
Join the discussion