Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Speed & distance Problem 1

Expert replies
by aditiniyer » Thu Jan 26, 2017 12:03 am
Tom & Linda stand at a point A. Linda begins to walk in a straight line away from Tom at a constant rate of 2 miles/hr. One hour later, Tom begins to jog in a straight line in the exact opposite direction at a constant rate of 6 miles per hour. If both Tom & Linda travel indefinitely, what is the positive difference in minutes between the amount of time it takes Tom to cover half the distance that Linda has covered and the amount of time it takes Tom to cover twice the distance that Linda has covered ?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jan 26, 2017 3:11 am
Tom and Linda stand at point A. Linda begins to walk in a straight line away from Tom at a constant rate of 2 miles per hour. One hour later, Tom begins to jog in a straight line in the exact opposite direction at a constant rate of 6 miles per hour. If both Tom and Linda travel indefinitely, what is the positive difference, in minutes, between the amount of time it takes Tom to cover half the distance that Linda has covered and the amount of time it takes Tom to cover twice the distance that Linda has covered?
A. 60
B. 72
C. 84
D. 90
E. 108
After 1 hour of walking at 2 miles per hour, Linda will have traveled r*t = 2*1 = 2 miles.

At this point Tom starts to jog at 6 miles per hour. Since Tom is traveling 3 times as fast as Linda, it won't take long for him to cover half the distance traveled by Linda.

15 minutes later, Tom will have traveled r*t = 6*(.25) = 1.5 miles.
Linda will have traveled a total of 2 + 2*(.25) = 2.5 miles.
Since Tom's distance is a little more than 1/2 of Linda's distance, the time needed for Tom to travel 1/2 of Linda's distance is a little less than 15 minutes.

Since Tom is traveling 3 times as fast, he will need only a few hours to cover twice the distance traveled by Linda.

After 2 hours have passed from when Tom starts to jog:
Tom will have traveled r*t = 6*2 = 12 miles.
Having started 1 hour earlier, Linda will have traveled r*t = 2*3 = 6 miles.
Since 12 = 2*6, the time needed for Tom to travel twice the distance traveled by Linda is 2 hours = 120 minutes.

Since 120-15 = 105 minutes, and Tom needs a little less than 15 minutes to travel 1/2 the distance covered by Linda, the correct answer must be a little more than 105.

The correct answer is E.
Last edited by GMATGuruNY on Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by Jay@ManhattanReview » Thu Jan 26, 2017 4:10 am
aditiniyer wrote:Tom & Linda stand at a point A. Linda begins to walk in a straight line away from Tom at a constant rate of 2 miles/hr. One hour later, Tom begins to jog in a straight line in the exact opposite direction at a constant rate of 6 miles per hour. If both Tom & Linda travel indefinitely, what is the positive difference in minutes between the amount of time it takes Tom to cover half the distance that Linda has covered and the amount of time it takes Tom to cover twice the distance that Linda has covered ?
Pl. post the complete question.

Coming to the question.

We are given that Linda's speed = 2 mph, thus in one hour, Linda is 2 miles away from point A.

Say Linda walked d miles, thus in the first instance, Tom also travelled d/2 miles and in the second instance, Tom walked 2d miles.

1. The first instance: Tom to cover half the distance that Linda has covered

Time taken by Tom = Time taken by Linda

(d/2)/6 = (d-2)/2 [Linda already has a lead of 2 miles]

=> d/12 = (d-2)/2

=> d = 12/5 miles

=> Tom walked d/2 = 6/5 miles, taking (6/5)/6 = 1/5 hr = 60/5 = 12 minutes

2. The second instance: Tom to cover twice the distance that Linda has covered

Time taken by Tom = Time taken by Linda

(2d)/6 = (d-2)/2 [Linda already has a lead of 2 miles]

=> d/3 = (d-2)/2

=> d = 6 miles

=> Tom walked 2d = 12 miles, taking 12/6 = 2 hr = 120 minutes

Difference of time = |12-120| = 108 minutes.

-Jay
_________________
Manhattan Review GMAT Prep

Locations: New York | Tokyo | Manchester | Geneva | and many more...

Schedule your free consultation with an experienced GMAT Prep Advisor! Click here.
Join the discussion

by Jeff@TargetTestPrep » Mon Jan 30, 2017 4:51 pm
Tom and Linda stand at point A. Linda begins to walk in a straight line away from Tom at a constant rate of 2 miles per hour. One hour later, Tom begins to jog in a straight line in the exact opposite direction at a constant rate of 6 miles per hour. If both Tom and Linda travel indefinitely, what is the positive difference, in minutes, between the amount of time it takes Tom to cover half the distance that Linda has covered and the amount of time it takes Tom to cover twice the distance that Linda has covered?
A. 60
B. 72
C. 84
D. 90
E. 108
We are given that Linda has a rate of 2 mph and that Tom has a rate of 6 mph. We are also given that Linda begins to walk away from Tom and then one hour later, Tom begins to jog in a straight line in the exact opposite direction. Thus, we can let Linda’s time = T + 1, and Tom’s time = T.

Let’s first determine the number of hours it takes Tom to cover half the distance Linda has gone. Since distance = rate x time, Linda’s distance = 2(T + 1) = 2T + 2, and Tom’s distance = 6T. So we can create the following equation and determine T:

(1/2)(2T + 2) = 6T

T + 1 = 6T

1 = 5T

T = 1/5 hour = 12 minutes

Next let’s determine the number hours it takes Tom to cover twice Linda’s distance.

(2)(2T + 2) = 6T

4T + 4 = 6T

4 = 2T

T = 2 hours = 120 minutes.

Thus, the difference in time is 120 - 12 = 108 minutes.

Answer: E

Jeffrey Miller
Head of GMAT Instruction
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews
Join the discussion