BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Spanish guitar

Expert replies
by whatjrohwants » Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:47 am
Spanish guitarist and composer Andres Segovia led the twentieth-century revival of the classical guitar, which was not considered sufficiently prestigious enough to be a concert instrument.

(a)Segovia led the twentieth-century revival of the classical guitar, which was not considered sufficiently prestigious enough to be
(b)Segovia, who led the twentieth-century revival of the classical guitar, had not been considered prestigious enough to be
(c)Segovia, leading the revival of the classical guitar in the twentieth century, not previously considered sufficiently prestigious for
(d)Segovia led the twentieth-century revival of the classical guitar, which had not previously been considered prestigious enough to be
(e)Segovia had led the revival of the classical guitar in the twentieth century, which was not considered sufficiently prestigious for

OA D
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by whatjrohwants » Mon Feb 13, 2012 9:50 am
I was stuck between A and D. Now I know why A is not right now, but I still think that 'had not previously been' in D is redundant. Doesn't past perfect tense already have the meaning 'prior to a certain event'? Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Join the discussion

by rajatvmittal » Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:33 am
A is not correct because use of sufficient and enough simultaneously makes the answer redundant.

'Had been' has been used as a passive voice just as 'To be' and I think there are no strings of events which is required to use the Past perfect and simple past (I guess this is what made you think it is redundant). Hence, use of 'previously' and 'Had been' does not make the sentence redundant.
Rather previously rightly points out the previous lack of sense of prestige among whosoever.

But if another answer choice were:
Segovia led the twentieth-century revival of the classical guitar, which WAS not previously considered prestigious enough to be

what would be the appropriate choice?

Rajat
Join the discussion

by whatjrohwants » Mon Feb 13, 2012 10:58 am
I thought the use of the past perfect tense was right since the perception of the guitar lasted up until the Adres's leading the revival, which was presented in past tense. And I thought the use of 'previously' was redundant because'had been considered' already has the meaning of this event taking place before Andres.

Concerning your question, I think that'll be a right choice as well.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1