BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

source: grockit

Expert replies
by joinashish » Thu Sep 15, 2011 11:37 pm
Q: Decreasing available grants, when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about funding shortages that can bankrupt many non-profit organizations.

A: when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about

B: when not relieved by alternative subsidies, brings about

C: when they were unrelieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

D: if not alternatively relieved by subsidies, possibly brings about

E: if not relieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

correct ans is E

My doubt is with the subject verb agreement;What does the phrase "Decreasing available grants," as subject refers, if it is singular then it should be followed by the verb 'brings" but in correct solution it is followed by the verb " bring". kindly help.
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by mundasingh123 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:12 am
E changes the meaning
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
Join the discussion

by gunjan1208 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:48 am
Q: Decreasing available grants, when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about funding shortages that can bankrupt many non-profit organizations.

A: when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about

B: when not relieved by alternative subsidies, brings about

C: when they were unrelieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

D: if not alternatively relieved by subsidies, possibly brings about

E: if not relieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about : This is the right answer & hang on,grants are not singular here. Alternative Subsidies becomes parallel to Grants but when usedwith the verb, it does not make sense. (Alternatively relieved....Looks like there are many other alternatives for the grants here)....Does this explanation suffice?
Join the discussion

by joinashish » Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:06 am
gunjan1208 wrote:Q: Decreasing available grants, when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about funding shortages that can bankrupt many non-profit organizations.

A: when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about

B: when not relieved by alternative subsidies, brings about

C: when they were unrelieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

D: if not alternatively relieved by subsidies, possibly brings about

E: if not relieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about : This is the right answer & hang on,grants are not singular here. Alternative Subsidies becomes parallel to Grants but when usedwith the verb, it does not make sense. (Alternatively relieved....Looks like there are many other alternatives for the grants here)....Does this explanation suffice?
Yes option E sounds better to ear too but isn't "decreasing" subject here. kindly clarify.
Join the discussion

by sunilrawat » Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:47 am
joinashish wrote:
gunjan1208 wrote:Q: Decreasing available grants, when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about funding shortages that can bankrupt many non-profit organizations.

A: when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about

B: when not relieved by alternative subsidies, brings about

C: when they were unrelieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

D: if not alternatively relieved by subsidies, possibly brings about

E: if not relieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about : This is the right answer & hang on,grants are not singular here. Alternative Subsidies becomes parallel to Grants but when usedwith the verb, it does not make sense. (Alternatively relieved....Looks like there are many other alternatives for the grants here)....Does this explanation suffice?
Yes option E sounds better to ear too but isn't "decreasing" subject here. kindly clarify.

The subject is "decreasing" only.
D is discarded because it changes the meaning. It sounds as if the subsidies are relieved alternatively. However, in actual case grants are relieved by alternate subsidies
Hope it's clear now.
:)
Join the discussion

by sunilrawat » Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:50 am
gunjan1208 wrote:Q: Decreasing available grants, when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about funding shortages that can bankrupt many non-profit organizations.

A: when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about

B: when not relieved by alternative subsidies, brings about

C: when they were unrelieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

D: if not alternatively relieved by subsidies, possibly brings about

E: if not relieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about : This is the right answer & hang on,grants are not singular here. Alternative Subsidies becomes parallel to Grants but when usedwith the verb, it does not make sense. (Alternatively relieved....Looks like there are many other alternatives for the grants here)....Does this explanation suffice?
The subject here is decreasing. Its the decreasing of grants that might bring about the funding shortages, not the grants themselves.
Join the discussion

by aspirant2011 » Fri Sep 16, 2011 7:21 am
joinashish wrote:Q: Decreasing available grants, when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about funding shortages that can bankrupt many non-profit organizations.

A: when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about

B: when not relieved by alternative subsidies, brings about

C: when they were unrelieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

D: if not alternatively relieved by subsidies, possibly brings about

E: if not relieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

correct ans is E

My doubt is with the subject verb agreement;What does the phrase "Decreasing available grants," as subject refers, if it is singular then it should be followed by the verb 'brings" but in correct solution it is followed by the verb " bring". kindly help.
Subject is plural i.e decreasing grants........decreasing is just modifying grants therefore bring is the right usage
Join the discussion

by VivianKerr » Fri Sep 16, 2011 7:27 am
"Grants" is the Subject and it is plural. It correctly matches the verb, "bring." "Decreasing available" modify "grants."

Remember that "when" can only be used to refer to time. If a conditional is implied, meaning "A" MIGHT occur IF "B" occurs, the word "if" is preferable.

We can eliminate A, B, and C based on this alone.

In D, the phrase "alternately relieved" is awkward, and "brings" is the wrong verb tense.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)
Join the discussion

by sunilrawat » Sat Sep 17, 2011 6:30 am
gunjan1208 wrote:Q: Decreasing available grants, when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about funding shortages that can bankrupt many non-profit organizations.

A: when unrelieved alternatively by subsidies, might bring about

B: when not relieved by alternative subsidies, brings about

C: when they were unrelieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about

D: if not alternatively relieved by subsidies, possibly brings about

E: if not relieved by alternative subsidies, might bring about : This is the right answer & hang on,grants are not singular here. Alternative Subsidies becomes parallel to Grants but when usedwith the verb, it does not make sense. (Alternatively relieved....Looks like there are many other alternatives for the grants here)....Does this explanation suffice?
sorry, my mistake
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1