BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Source : GMAT PREP :New Q for old stimuli.

Expert replies
by himu » Tue Dec 10, 2013 10:47 pm
In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?
A. During the second year after the tax increase, cigarette sales increased by a significant amount.
B. The information available to consumers on the health risks of smoking remained largely unchanged in the period before and after the tax increase.
C. Most consumers were unaware that the tax on cigarettes was going to increase.
D. During the year following the cigarette tax increase, many consumers had less income, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than they had had in the previous year.
E. During the year after the tax increase, there was a greater variety of cigarettes on the market than there had been during the previous year.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:51 pm
himu wrote:In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.
Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?
Certain patterns recur regularly in CR - possibly the most common argument form is causation.

We can paraphrase this entire argument as "the increase in price is responsible for the decrease in sales".

The most common ways to strengthen a causal argument are:
1) eliminate alternative causes; and
2) provide more evidence supporting the relationship.

On this question, (B) falls into the first category of strengthener. What's another reason why sales may have dropped? Because people became more aware that cigarettes were bad for them. (B) eliminates that possibility, thereby making it more likely that the author's explanation is correct.

If we're asked to weaken a causal argument, the two most common ways to do so are:
1) suggest an alternative cause; and
2) break the link between the cause and effect (i.e. suggest that the two are unrelated).

A much less-common third way to weaken is:
3) show that the author may have cause and effect backwards.

Stuart
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion

by himu » Tue Dec 10, 2013 11:55 pm
Thanks so much Stuart :)
Join the discussion

by Abhishek009 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:56 am
himu wrote:In the year following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.
1. 8 % Fed tax reduced consumption by 10%

2. Before increasing Tax consumption reduced 1%

3. Sale of Cigarettes is strongly related to after Tax Price per pack.


Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

We simply have to support the red highlighted conclusion..


A. During the second year after the tax increase, cigarette sales increased by a significant amount.

Irrelevant , not supporting the argument...

B. The information available to consumers on the health risks of smoking remained largely unchanged in the period before and after the tax increase.

Ok , this is just a general background of the scenario suggesting things remained the same except Taxation , which affected the consumption behaviour...

This can be an answer choice..

C. Most consumers were unaware that the tax on cigarettes was going to increase.

So ? What does it result in , consumption of cigarettes decreased and this option provides no connection ...

D. During the year following the cigarette tax increase, many consumers had less income, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than they had had in the previous year.

This is weakening the argument , suggesting that something else was responsible for the decline in sale of Cigarettes , other than Taxation...

This option can be rejected.

E. During the year after the tax increase, there was a greater variety of cigarettes on the market than there had been during the previous year.

Out of scope ...[/u]
Abhishek
Join the discussion