BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Something wrong with this question?

Expert replies
by gmatwarroom » Sat May 05, 2012 11:53 am
I found this question-n-answer on net and somehow not convinced with the question -- seems question was not put "accurately", not the way it was solved.

******************************************
Ques: The sum of the even numbers between 1 and n is 79*80, where n is an odd number, then n=?

Sol: First term a=2, common difference d=2 since even number
an = a1 + (n - 1)d, n = 1, 2, ...
therefore sum to first n numbers of Arithmetic progression would be
n/2(2a+(n-1)d)
= n/2(2*2+(n-1)*2)=n(n+1) and this is equal to 79*80
therefore n=79 which is odd...
******************************************

In the question, it says "n is an odd number" and so it's pointing that n is the value of nth term and not the value of n (i.e. # of terms in the series). However, in solution, it used "n" as the # of terms in the series -- which is wrong.

As I understand,
Series would be: 2, 4, 6, 8 ..... (n-1)
getting # of terms (x) in the series:
n-1 = 2 + (x-1)* 2 => n-1 = 2 + 2x - 2 = 2x ==> x = (n-1)/2
therefore Sum = x/2 [ 2*2 + (x-1)*2] = (n-1)/4 [ 4 + 2x - 2] = (n-1)/4 [2 + 2x] = (n-1)/2 [x+1]
= (n-1)/2 [ (n-1)/2 +1 ] = (n-1)2 [ (n+1)/2] = ( n square - 1 ) / 4 = 79*80
==> n square = 79*80*4 +1 ==> n = 159 which is odd number

Can someone verify and reconfirm? Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Bill@VeritasPrep » Sat May 05, 2012 1:10 pm
Yep, you did it correctly. That's one of the issues with doing problems from sets that float around the Internet.
Join Veritas Prep's 2010 Instructor of the Year, Matt Douglas for GMATT Mondays

Visit the Veritas Prep Blog

Try the FREE Veritas Prep Practice Test
Join the discussion

by GMATGuruNY » Sat May 05, 2012 3:42 pm
gmatwarroom wrote:I found this question-n-answer on net and somehow not convinced with the question -- seems question was not put "accurately", not the way it was solved.

******************************************
Ques: The sum of the even numbers between 1 and n is 79*80, where n is an odd number, then n=?

Can someone verify and reconfirm? Thanks
I too get an answer of 159.

This problem becomes less tricky if we realize that 79*80 represents the formula for the sum of evenly spaced integers:

Sum = (number of integers) * (average of the biggest and smallest)

Thus, 79 = the number of even integers and 80 = the average of the biggest and smallest.
Let x = the biggest integer.
The smallest integer = 2.
(x+2)/2 = 80.
x+2 = 160
x = 158.
Thus, 79*80 represents the sum of the even integers from 2 to 158.
Since n is the next biggest odd integer, n=159.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by krishna239455 » Sat May 05, 2012 11:01 pm
hi mitch

u have considered 80 as average because it is given that n is odd number, rigth?

if it is not given then will it be difficult to say whether 79 or 80 is the average?

pls reply
Join the discussion

by krishna239455 » Sat May 05, 2012 11:03 pm
hi mitch

u have considered 80 as average because it is given that n is odd number, rigth?

if it is not given then will it be difficult to say whether 79 or 80 is the average?

pls reply
Join the discussion

by gmatwarroom » Sun May 06, 2012 3:13 pm
Hi Mitch,

thanks for the formula -- helps.

However, even I have the same question that Krishna asked -- pls let us know.

Secondly, going by the formula, if 79 is the # of terms in the series then the greatest value (in the series) is straight to find i.e. 79*2 = 158 (as we are dealing with consecutive even numbers) - so, I don't see the need of using any further calculation of average etc.

What you think?
Join the discussion