BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Some anthropologists study modern-day societies

Expert replies
by BTGmoderatorDC » Wed Jul 11, 2018 5:38 am

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty

Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern nonforager societies.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?

(A) All forager societies throughout history have had a number of important features in common that are absent from other types of societies.

(B) Most ancient forager societies either dissolved or made a transition to another way of life.

(C) All anthropologists study one kind or another of modern-day society.

(D) Many anthropologists who study modern-day forager societies do not draw inferences about ancient societies on the basis of their studies.

(E) Even those modern-day forager societies that have not had significant contact with modern societies are importantly different from ancient forager societies.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by deloitte247 » Wed Jul 11, 2018 7:39 am
Option A - INCORRECT.
Due to the extreme variety of the foragers, it has made it complex to differentiate the importance features in common from the old to the modernized one, but it is easy to identify them as a forager no matter what, compared to other societies who does not have a generational legacy.

Option B - INCORRECT.
It is clear that foragers does not eradicate themselves completely from the society, they find a way to implement their legacy one way or the other mostly by recreating in a new dimension but still upholding the old rules of the game. However, convincing the anthropologist of been a non-forager society.

Option C - INCORRECT.
All anthropologist study has been on the same society ''foragers'', be it modern or non-forager society. Because they all have same speculations just that one is in a modernized form than the other.

Option D - INCORRECT.
This option would have weaken the criticism but was not strong enough. The anthropologist actually have drawn their studies from the modern foragers in other to study the ancient ancestors who were foragers. Meaning that the modern foragers is a lead to getting to know more about the ancient foragers.

Option E - CORRECT.
This option has seriously weaken the criticism made of the anthropologist strategy. Since the foragers varies, then it is certain that one way or the other the modern foragers would have had contact with the modern societies, because foragers don't vanish for the society they only split and expand by recreating or establishing a name for themselves in the modern society, which makes the modern one not different from the ancient foragers.
Join the discussion