BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Solving equations and inequalities with absolute values

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
by bdevas01 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 7:56 am
I'm a little confused when it comes to equations and inequalities containing absolute values.

As I understand it, the first step with both equations and inequalities is to isolate the absolute value. But absolute value problems usually have two solutions: one positive and one negative.

So what should be the next step? Should the value opposite the absolute value be negated? Or should the absolute value itself be negated? Is there different method for inequalities and equations?
Join the discussion
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |

by ajith » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:12 am
bdevas01 wrote:I'm a little confused when it comes to equations and inequalities containing absolute values.

As I understand it, the first step with both equations and inequalities is to isolate the absolute value. But absolute value problems usually have two solutions: one positive and one negative.

So what should be the next step? Should the value opposite the absolute value be negated? Or should the absolute value itself be negated? Is there different method for inequalities and equations?
One obvious answer to the questions posed is, "it depends". There is no one size fits all approach apart from a few ground rules.

Post the question you are facing the problem with a specific query and I am sure many in this forum will be more than happy to help you.
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by bdevas01 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:36 am
That's a good point Ajith. However, I still believe there are a few hard and fast rules when approaching absolute values.

Anyway, here are a few examples:

In this inequality, the absolute value itself is negated to find the negative solution:

|4x - 4| > 16

Positive:

4x - 4 > 16
4x - 4 + 4 > 16 + 4
4x > 20
x > 5

Negative:

-1(4x - 4) > 16
-4x + 4 > 16
-4x + 4 - 4 > 16 - 4
-4x > 12
x < -3

In this equation, the value opposite the absolute value expression is negated to find the negative solution:

|x + 5| + 20 = 60

|x + 5| + 20 - 20 = 60 - 20

|x + 5| = 40

X is Positive:
x + 5 = 40
x + 5 - 5 = 40 - 5
x = 35

X is Negative:
x + 5 = -40
x = -45

My question is, why is the method different for both problems?
Join the discussion

by ajith » Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:58 am
bdevas01 wrote:That's a good point Ajith. However, I still believe there are a few hard and fast rules when approaching absolute values.

Anyway, here are a few examples:

In this inequality, the absolute value itself is negated to find the negative solution:

|4x - 4| > 16

Positive:

4x - 4 > 16
4x - 4 + 4 > 16 + 4
4x > 20
x > 5

Negative:

-1(4x - 4) > 16
-4x + 4 > 16
-4x + 4 - 4 > 16 - 4
-4x > 12
x < -3

In this equation, the value opposite the absolute value expression is negated to find the negative solution:

|x + 5| + 20 = 60

|x + 5| + 20 - 20 = 60 - 20

|x + 5| = 40

X is Positive:
x + 5 = 40
x + 5 - 5 = 40 - 5
x = 35

X is Negative:
x + 5 = -40
x = -45

My question is, why is the method different for both problems?
To answer your query, if you are dealing with an equation it doesnt matter which side you negate (as in your second example) as long as you have only absolute function in one side. This is because

x = 1 means the same as -x = -1




But if you are dealing with an inequality, you need to be a bit more careful, because sign changes when you multiply both sides by a negative value.

What you need to do is to consider both possibilities without changing the sign (as you have done in the second example)

this is because

x<1 does not imply -x<-1
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion

by bdevas01 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:36 am
Yes, I think you're correct about how it doesn't matter which side is negated with equations.

As for inequalities, I believe the rule is that the absolute value expression is always the side that is negated. I've tried a few examples (posted below) and it appears to be the only way to get the right answer.

Example 1:

|x + 7| < 14

Positive:

x + 7 < 14
x + 7 - 7 < 14 - 7
x < 7

Negative:

-1(x + 7) < 14
-x - 7 < 14
-x - 7 + 7 < 14 + 7
-x < 21
x > -21

Example 2:

10 + |2x + 15| < 55

Positive:

2x + 15 < 45
2x + 15 -15 < 45 - 15
2x < 30
x < 15

Negative:

-(2x + 15) < 45
-2x - 15 < 45
-2x - 15 + 15 < 45 + 15
-2x < 60
x > -30

Example 3:

|x + 7| < 14
Positive:

x + 7 < 14
x + 7 - 7 < 14 - 7
x < 7

Negative:

-1(x + 7) < 14
-x - 7 < 14
-x - 7 + 7 < 14 + 7
-x < 21
x > -21
Join the discussion

by ajith » Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:39 am
Thanks for the examples. I think you summed up the discussion very well.
Always borrow money from a pessimist, he doesn't expect to be paid back.
Join the discussion