BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Solved a DS prob & GMAT testsoftware says it can't be do

Expert replies
by chinamanjoe » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:13 am
Hi there!

I was practising DS problems today, using the official GMAT testprep software that I'm sure all of you are familiar with.

Now, I came across a problem and solved it. Checked the answer and GMAT software tells me there is not sufficient info given in both statements.

Imho, this question only asks how much Mary is paying for 1 hardcover and 1 paperback book. It does not ask for the price of each book respectively! So I can use the info in the statements (either one will do) and just get an average price for the books the others bought.

You multiply that average price by the two books Mary bought and, voila, you got the answer that she'll have to pay 5$!

Am I being a prick about the wording here? Or are my math skills really that bad?

Please have a look, or maybe dl the testprep software, do the DS exercises and you should see it as well. Attached is a screenshot for your reference.

Anybody out there that agrees with me?

Also, has anyone taken the GMAT in a country where they use non English layout Keyboards (i.e. Germany, France, Belgium etc)? I did a couple of weeks ago in Germany, ahd to use a German keyboard. I was provided by a one page laminated sheet of shortcuts etc! Not very fair, standardised or professional I think!
Attachments
GMAT Mistake.JPG
screenshot of the DS problem
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by xcusemeplz2009 » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:30 am
OA is correct.

first thing when there are two variables we need two eqn to solve it.
we need to find x+y
if x is the price of a paprebook and y of a hardcover then
Statement 1):- 2x+3y=12.5 not sufficient
Statement 2):-4x+6y=25 which is same as 2x+3y=12.5 not suff.

now combining both we cant get any thing as both are same eqn

so ans is E
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

damnitt you're right!

by chinamanjoe » Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:27 pm
yeah i just got it. quite simple once you understand it actually. bummer for my motivation. why can't the gmat focus entirely on language ;-) ?

thanks anyways, though!
Join the discussion