BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Solved a DS prob & GMAT testsoftware says it can't be do

Expert replies
by chinamanjoe » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:13 am
Hi there!

I was practising DS problems today, using the official GMAT testprep software that I'm sure all of you are familiar with.

Now, I came across a problem and solved it. Checked the answer and GMAT software tells me there is not sufficient info given in both statements.

Imho, this question only asks how much Mary is paying for 1 hardcover and 1 paperback book. It does not ask for the price of each book respectively! So I can use the info in the statements (either one will do) and just get an average price for the books the others bought.

You multiply that average price by the two books Mary bought and, voila, you got the answer that she'll have to pay 5$!

Am I being a prick about the wording here? Or are my math skills really that bad?

Please have a look, or maybe dl the testprep software, do the DS exercises and you should see it as well. Attached is a screenshot for your reference.

Anybody out there that agrees with me?

Also, has anyone taken the GMAT in a country where they use non English layout Keyboards (i.e. Germany, France, Belgium etc)? I did a couple of weeks ago in Germany, ahd to use a German keyboard. I was provided by a one page laminated sheet of shortcuts etc! Not very fair, standardised or professional I think!
Attachments
GMAT Mistake.JPG
screenshot of the DS problem
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by xcusemeplz2009 » Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:30 am
OA is correct.

first thing when there are two variables we need two eqn to solve it.
we need to find x+y
if x is the price of a paprebook and y of a hardcover then
Statement 1):- 2x+3y=12.5 not sufficient
Statement 2):-4x+6y=25 which is same as 2x+3y=12.5 not suff.

now combining both we cant get any thing as both are same eqn

so ans is E
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

damnitt you're right!

by chinamanjoe » Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:27 pm
yeah i just got it. quite simple once you understand it actually. bummer for my motivation. why can't the gmat focus entirely on language ;-) ?

thanks anyways, though!
Join the discussion