BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Smoke in the water

Expert replies
by sourabh33 » Sun May 22, 2011 10:51 pm
An international study recently examined the effects of second hand smoke on health. surprisingly, although the dosages of harmful chemicals form second hand smoke are so small that their effect should be negligible, the study found that nonsmoking spouses of smokers displayed an incidence of heart disease that was significantly greater than that of nonsmokers who were not as regularly exposed to second hand smoke.

Each of the following if true could contribute to an explanation of the unexpectedly high incidence of heart disease in smoker's spouses EXCEPT:

A. A disproportionately high number of people married to smokers are among the older segment of the married population, a group that inherently has a higher than average risk of heart disease

B. on average, more alcohol and coffee both of which have been linked to heart disease, are consumed in the homes of smokers than in the homes of nonsmokers.

C. A disproportionately high number of smokers are married to other smokers and the risk of heart disease increases in proportion to the number of smokers living in a household.

D. Smokers generally tend to live in higher stress environments than do non smokers and stress is a factor associated with above average incidence of heart disease.

E.A disproportionately high number of smokers live in areas with a high level of industrial pollutants, which have been shown to be a factor in increased risk of heart disease
Last edited by sourabh33 on Mon May 23, 2011 2:31 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by smackmartine » Sun May 22, 2011 11:35 pm
IMO C

The argument talks about smokers and their non smoking spouse.

A and B clearly shows that other factors contribute to an explanation of high incidence of heart disease. In A,old segment of married population with higher than average risk of heart disease. In B, alcohol and coffee have been linked to heart disease.

C is the only option which mentions about smokers and their smoker spouses. It add little to an explanation of high incidence of heart disease among non smoking spouse.

D and E mention stress and industrial pollutants to be factors in increased risk of heart disease. Both D and E may imply that smoker could have non smoking spouse.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Mon May 23, 2011 1:28 am
+1 for D

btw u made a typo error in the argument, here in red

An international study recently examined the effects of second hand smoke on health. surprisingly, although the dosages of harmful chemicals form second hand smoke are so small that their effect should be negligible, the study found that nonsmoking souses of smokers displayed an incidence of heart disease that was significantly greater than that of nonsmokers who were not as regularly exposed to second hand smoke.

souses:-- this word has a completely diff meaning...
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Mon May 23, 2011 2:21 am
IMO D

"Smokers generally tend to live in higher stress environments than do non smokers and stress is a factor associated with above average incidence of heart disease".


It does not talk about spouses of smokers and even if smokers live in stressed environment than we can't asume that it will increase chances of heart attack in their spouses.
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by sourabh33 » Mon May 23, 2011 2:31 am
Typo corrected
Join the discussion

by champmag » Mon May 23, 2011 2:56 am
+1 for D
Join the discussion

by sourabh33 » Mon May 23, 2011 3:42 am
OA is C

Source: Kaplan 800

OE -> similar to smackmartine's

An international study recently examined the effects of second hand smoke on health. surprisingly, although the dosages of harmful chemicals form second hand smoke are so small that their effect should be negligible, the study found that nonsmoking spouses of smokers displayed an incidence of heart disease that was significantly greater than that of nonsmokers who were not as regularly exposed to second hand smoke.

Option C: Talks about smoking couples and not non smoking spouse.
Join the discussion

by atulmangal » Mon May 23, 2011 7:01 am
ankurmit wrote:IMO D

"Smokers generally tend to live in higher stress environments than do non smokers and stress is a factor associated with above average incidence of heart disease".


It does not talk about spouses of smokers and even if smokers live in stressed environment than we can't asume that it will increase chances of heart attack in their spouses.
This is exactly what i thought and picked Op D as my answer.
Join the discussion

by ankurmit » Mon May 23, 2011 7:13 am
atulmangal wrote:
ankurmit wrote:IMO D

"Smokers generally tend to live in higher stress environments than do non smokers and stress is a factor associated with above average incidence of heart disease".


It does not talk about spouses of smokers and even if smokers live in stressed environment than we can't asume that it will increase chances of heart attack in their spouses.
This is exactly what i thought and picked Op D as my answer.

But surprisingly OA is c and I could not understand how :)
--------
Ankur mittal
Join the discussion

by KapTeacherEli » Mon May 23, 2011 9:41 am
D) The GMAT generally rewards people who can avoid making unnecessary assumptions, but we still can use our common sense: it's safe to assume that spouses live together. If the data tell us that smokers are more likely to live in high-stress environments, it follows that non-smokers married to smokers are more likely to live in a high-stress environment than non-smokers married to fellow non-smokers. (the reverse is also true, but the risk of heart disease in smokers isn't relevant here)

C, however, specifically addresses smoking couples--a group explicitly excluded from the prompt. C is irrelevant to the stimulus, and is thus the correct answer.

Hope this helps!
Eli Meyer
Kaplan GMAT Teacher
Cambridge, MA
www.kaptest.com/gmat

ImageImageImage
Join the discussion