BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Slope DS

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by yalanand » Tue Jan 13, 2009 11:53 am
I will go for C....both options are required because


Slope of line = (r-t) / (-s-u)
= (r-t)/-(s+u)

So slope of the line will be negative if

r-t > 0 and s+u > 0 (u>-s)
Join the discussion

by aj5105 » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:08 pm
This is what I was looking for !
yalanand wrote:I will go for C....both options are required because


Slope of line = (r-t) / (-s-u)
= (r-t)/-(s+u)

So slope of the line will be negative if

r-t > 0 and s+u > 0 (u>-s)
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:11 pm
aj5105 wrote:This is what I was looking for !
yalanand wrote:I will go for C....both options are required because


Slope of line = (r-t) / (-s-u)
= (r-t)/-(s+u)

So slope of the line will be negative if

r-t > 0 and s+u > 0 (u>-s)
This is a clear and concise solution .. I was fretting with all unwanted facts and got confused. Thanks

- pradeep
In the land of night, the chariot of the sun is drawn by the grateful dead
https://questor.blocked

GMATPREP1 - 550 (Oct 08)
MGMAT FREE CAT - 600 (Dec 08)
MGMAT CAT1 - 670 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT2 - 550 (Jan 09)
MGMAT CAT3 - 640 ( Feb 09)
MGMAT CAT4 - 660 ( Feb 09)
Join the discussion

by yalanand » Tue Jan 13, 2009 12:18 pm
Welcome :)...and wish me BOF...I need all your wishes
Join the discussion

by welcome » Tue Jan 13, 2009 3:46 pm
Do we really need to go for C. I think A is enough.

Please clarify. If given r,t,u, -s are holding the sign, then by basic number prop. u+s will be +ve anyways.
Shubham.
590 >> 630 >> 640 >> 610 >> 600 >> 640 >> 590 >> 640 >> 590 >> 590
Join the discussion

by logitech » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:26 pm
yalanand wrote:I will go for C....both options are required because


Slope of line = (r-t) / (-s-u)
= (r-t)/-(s+u)

So slope of the line will be negative if

r-t > 0 and s+u > 0 (u>-s)
Slope = y1-y2/x1-x2

So even tough it does not change the answer, slope is = (u+s)/(t-r)
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by malhotneha » Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:20 am
welcome wrote:Do we really need to go for C. I think A is enough.

Please clarify. If given r,t,u, -s are holding the sign, then by basic number prop. u+s will be +ve anyways.
I agree. Even I think A is enough.
Join the discussion

by yalanand » Wed Jan 14, 2009 11:56 am
I still think its C....because r,t,u,s are all variables which can be +ve or -ve...
Join the discussion

by 4meonly » Thu Jan 15, 2009 12:39 am
I am also with C
Join the discussion

by duccio » Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:21 am
I'd go with A
Join the discussion

by duccio » Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:35 am
you are right, we actually do not know if r u t s are positive or negative
so A is INSUFF ===> C

yalanand wrote:I still think its C....because r,t,u,s are all variables which can be +ve or -ve...
Join the discussion