BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Slavery

Expert replies
by nileshdalvi » Sun Sep 18, 2011 6:52 am
The first African slaves were brought to the
Americas in the early 1600s, where their labor was
used primarily for agricultural and household
purposes. The institution of slavery in the New
World presupposes not only the existence of slaves
and owners, but also a system of laws in place
which recognized and protected the practice of
slavery. However, laws were not enacted, for
example, declaring slaves the personal property of
their owners and imposing punishments upon those
who aided slaves in escape, until many years later.
If the sentences in the passage above are true, then
they support which one of the following statements?
(A) Arguing that laws needed to be enacted
recognizing and protecting the institution of
slavery before the practice of slavery could
have existed in the New World is to ignore
historical fact.
(B) Prior to 1700, some of the Europeans who
came to the New World enslaved native
Indian populations.
(C) Slavery was practiced in many parts of the
world before Africans were first brought to
the New World as slaves.
(D) The prior existence of a supportive legal
system is needed before an institutional practice
can develop.
(E) One of the reasons slavery developed in the
New World was the tremendous need for
manual labor.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by dhonu121 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:39 am
This one is an inference/conclusion question type in my opinion.
I would go for A here.
Since other one's B-E are out of scope.They must not necessarily be true for the above mentioned argument.
What's the OA ?
Join the discussion

by nileshdalvi » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:47 am
@dhonu121: Any other way apart from PoE to obtain this answer. BTW, your answer is correct. But I also cannot see how A is necessarily true for the above mentioned argument. How does it mean ignoring the historical fact??
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:00 am
Thanks Nilesh for confirming the answer.
How I approached this one was firstly I read all the answer choices.Except A all of them did not sounded must be true kind to me.However, I was not sure about A.
Then when I read A again, I was more convinced about its being that right answer than others.
Basically, there are two things why I preferred A over others.
1.A is within the scope of the argument.i.e. It talks nothing about things that are not mentioned in the stimulus.
2.It says things that are correct beyond reasonable doubt.
The passage mentions that there was a system of laws in place
which recognized and protected the practice of
slavery.
. And it says nothing about that laws needed to be enacted
recognizing and protecting the institution of
slavery before the practice of slavery could
have existed in the New World
which is stated in choice A.
Hence to say this would be wrong.
Choice A just paraphrases this.
Hence, A wins.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion

by nileshdalvi » Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 am
@Dhonu121: Sorry but I could not understand the point 2 you mentioned. I agree with point 1 that it is within the scope of the argument but of course that should not be the only criteria to judge an answer choice.

About the argument, it is mentioned that the institution presupposes that laws should exist along with slavery. But, laws were enacted later. So, if I argue that the laws needed to be enacted earlier, it is surely against the historical fact, but I wont be ignoring the historical fact.

I have no doubt that the answer should be A because the others are nowhere close, but I seem to not meet the link in the correct answer choice.
Join the discussion

by dhonu121 » Sun Sep 18, 2011 10:08 am
In this case I would say that 1 alone suffices to rule out other answer choices.
Rest all answer choices are outside the scope of the argument and hence are ruled out.

About 2, If you feel that 1 above is not sufficient to rule out other answer choices(which it actually is :)), I think that the argument mentions that there were already laws before.Hence, the presense of laws tells emphasises the need about the presense of those laws.Also, the laws that were enacted were not exactly the ones that existed before and that are mentioned in choice A.
Hence this suggests, that laws mentioned were already there and followed too.
I would suggest not to compare things in option A and in the passage literally.That should help.
If you've liked my post, let me know by pressing the thanks button.
Join the discussion