BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Skull bearibg traits!!

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pmFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 127 times
by gmat_perfect » Sat Jul 03, 2010 11:33 am
A one-million-year-old skull bearing traits associated both with Homo erectus and, in addition, Homo sapiens has been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, and indicates that modern humans developed much earlier than previously thought.

(A) both with Homo erectus and, in addition, Homo sapiens has been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, and indicates
(B) both with Homo erectus and Homo sapiens have been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, which indicates
(C) with both Homo erectus and Homo sapiens has been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, indicating
(D) with both Homo erectus and Homo sapiens and found in the Afar region of Eritrea, indicating
(E) with both Homo erectus and Homo sapiens have been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, which indicates

I have reached to right answer in the following way:

1. Both XX and YY, where XX and YY MUST be parallel.

So, in A and B, "both with XX,....: must have another "And with YY", which is not there. So, they are out.

2. which refers to immediate preceding noun. So, E is out because region can not indicate.

3. "bearing traits associated with both X and Y" is the modifier of SKULL. So, and found in the option D is not correct.

The sentence could be "Skull was associated and found". "AND found" MUST have a previous parallel verb. So, I eliminated it.

My question:

Am I right? If not, what is the reason(s) for elimination of D?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 128 times

by grockit_andrea » Sat Jul 03, 2010 12:40 pm
You're really close! You just missed one crucial issue in D: there's no verb. "[A]ssociated with" modifies "traits," "found" is referring (awkwardly, as you pointed out) to "skull," but the gerund "indicating" isn't a viable verb here, because it again is describing the previous subjects. In order to avoid that, the verb "indicates" would have to be used instead. The comma preceding it would have to go as well, I think, unless there was further restructuring of the sentence. Then the subject would be 'skull,' and the verb would be 'indicates.'
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 12:53 am
Location: Chennai,India
Thanked: 3 times

by paddle_sweep » Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:35 pm
I will go with [spoiler]'C'[/spoiler]. Pls post OA.

Cheers
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:30 am
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:740

by gmat_Tutor » Sun Jul 04, 2010 12:30 am
grockit_andrea wrote:You're really close! You just missed one crucial issue in D: there's no verb. "[A]ssociated with" modifies "traits," "found" is referring (awkwardly, as you pointed out) to "skull," but the gerund "indicating" isn't a viable verb here, because it again is describing the previous subjects. In order to avoid that, the verb "indicates" would have to be used instead. The comma preceding it would have to go as well, I think, unless there was further restructuring of the sentence. Then the subject would be 'skull,' and the verb would be 'indicates.'
Thanks Grockit.

I have another question.

In the option C, the correct choice, we can find the following summary.

Skull has been found in ARE, indicating

=> We know "COMMA + VERBING" modifies the preceding clause. It is also a clause, but it is in passive form.

Then are the following sentences right?

The proposal has been canceled, implying that it will not work.

The book has been banned, saying that it is illegal.

Thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 173 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:23 am
grockit_andrea wrote:You're really close! You just missed one crucial issue in D: there's no verb. "[A]ssociated with" modifies "traits," "found" is referring (awkwardly, as you pointed out) to "skull," but the gerund "indicating" isn't a viable verb here, because it again is describing the previous subjects. In order to avoid that, the verb "indicates" would have to be used instead. The comma preceding it would have to go as well, I think, unless there was further restructuring of the sentence. Then the subject would be 'skull,' and the verb would be 'indicates.'
@Andrea..so u mean to say E is correct??

But here the subject is "Skull"( Singular) and " has been found"(Singular form) correctly matches with the subject.

Whereas in E, S&V mismatch is there.

IMO C

Plz correct me!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2326
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 3:54 amFollowed by: 2 members
Thanked: 173 times
GMAT Score:710

by gmatmachoman » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:38 am
Posted in Arcehealogy Journal( Just googled it)

A one-million-year-old skull bearing traits associated with both Homo erectus and Homo sapiens has been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, pushing back the development of modern human morphology by some 300,000 years. Excavated between 1995 and 1997 by Ernesto Abbate of the Università di Firenze (Florence, Italy) and an international team of paleoanthropologists, the nearly complete cranium of an adult, along with two pelvic fragments and two incisors, was recovered from ancient lake and river sediments deposited within the primarily volcanic Northern Danakil Formation.


C is correct option!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 357
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 8:31 pmFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 128 times

by grockit_andrea » Sun Jul 04, 2010 5:12 am
gmatmachoman wrote:Posted in Arcehealogy Journal( Just googled it)

A one-million-year-old skull bearing traits associated with both Homo erectus and Homo sapiens has been found in the Afar region of Eritrea, pushing back the development of modern human morphology by some 300,000 years. Excavated between 1995 and 1997 by Ernesto Abbate of the Università di Firenze (Florence, Italy) and an international team of paleoanthropologists, the nearly complete cranium of an adult, along with two pelvic fragments and two incisors, was recovered from ancient lake and river sediments deposited within the primarily volcanic Northern Danakil Formation.


C is correct option!!
@gmatmachoman: gmat_perfect eliminated A,B,D, and E; I was just explaining a point that he had missed when eliminating D. I agree that C is the correct answer; not sure what in my post would have implied otherwise.

@gmat_Tutor: Your first example sentence, "The proposal has been..." is fine, but I don't think the second one works. I can't cite to a precise rule for that, but I believe it has something to do with the specific gerunds being used. "Saying" is too specific; the action itself couldn't "say" that the book is illegal, but it could, for instance, "suggest" that the book is illegal.
Andrea A.
Grockit Tutor
https://www.grockit.com
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 7:54 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 8 times

by deep.amangmat » Fri Jul 01, 2011 7:18 am
Thanks Andrea for your detailed explanation choice D.

However, I have one more question. You said that "bearing traits..." and "found in..." are two modifiers for the noun "skull". I know these are in non-underlined portion of the sentence. But can these be parallel? They are not in same form. One is in verb-ed and the other in verb-ing.

Thanks,

Aman
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pmFollowed by: 227 members
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times

by e-GMAT » Sat Jul 02, 2011 4:26 pm
Yes, we can have verb-ed modifier parallel to verb-ing modifier, if the information provided by each is logically parallel to each other. In this case, these modifiers explain the "skull" - verb-ing modifier explained the characteristics of this skull and the verb-ed modifier explains where it was found. Now both these findings result in the conclusion drawn in the following verb-ing modifier - indicating that..... Thus, from the context of the sentence, these two are logically parallel. Now there are other questions in which such parallelism has been seen, e.g. OG12#42.

Hope this helps.

Thanks,

Payal
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 8:46 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by jonathan123456 » Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:20 pm
IMO C
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1