BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

six-month old babies

Expert replies
by GmatKiss » Mon Mar 05, 2012 7:19 pm
In an experiment, researchers played a series of musical intervals - two-note sequences - to a large diverse group of six-month old babies. They found that the babies paid significantly more attention when the intervals were perfect octaves, fifths, or fourths than otherwise. These intervals are prevalent in the musical systems of most cultures around the world. Thus, humans probably have a biological predisposition to pay more attention to those intervals than to others.

Which one of the following, if true most strengthens the argument?

A) Several similar experiments using older children and adults found that these subjects, too, had a general tendency to pay more attention to octaves, fifths, and fourths than to other musical intervals.

B) None of the babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture.

C) All of the babies in the experiment had been exposed to music drawn equally from a wide variety of cultures around the world.

D) In a second experiment, these same babies showed no clear tendency to notice primary colors more than other colors.

E) Octaves, fifths, and fourths were played more frequently during the experiment than other musical intervals were.

IMO: B
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by killer1387 » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:00 pm
imo B
Join the discussion

by mankey » Mon Mar 05, 2012 9:53 pm
IMO: B. We need to show that this is a trait inherent in human beings.

What is the OA?

Regards.
Join the discussion

by mankey » Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:18 am
What is the OA?

Regards.
Join the discussion

by chris@magoosh » Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:35 pm
The argument claims that humans, regardless of their respective culture, are born predisposed to certain musical intervals. The evidence: six-month old babies have a predilection for 4ths, 5ths, and octaves. We are looking to strengthen this claim.

One way of looking at a STRENGTHEN question is that we want an answer choice that "plugs up a hole" in the argument.

With our six-month babies, one could counter that the babies had already been exposed to music from their respective culture. After all, the prompt says that all music contains these intervals. So if babies have been exposed to music, then they've already developed a fondness for these intervals before the experiment.

Only (B) diffuses this objection by stating, "None of these babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture."

Therefore the answer is clearly (B) :).
Join the discussion

by john_miles » Wed Mar 14, 2012 12:06 am
I dont think B is the answer , say if the adults and grown up children dont have any exposure to music will still show the same result , so we cannot consider this answer

if we look at option which shows childrens from varied parts of world , this shows diversity that even location doesn't matter in reacting to music.
Join the discussion

by vishal.pathak » Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:36 pm
chris@magoosh wrote:The argument claims that humans, regardless of their respective culture, are born predisposed to certain musical intervals. The evidence: six-month old babies have a predilection for 4ths, 5ths, and octaves. We are looking to strengthen this claim.

One way of looking at a STRENGTHEN question is that we want an answer choice that "plugs up a hole" in the argument.

With our six-month babies, one could counter that the babies had already been exposed to music from their respective culture. After all, the prompt says that all music contains these intervals. So if babies have been exposed to music, then they've already developed a fondness for these intervals before the experiment.

Only (B) diffuses this objection by stating, "None of these babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture."

Therefore the answer is clearly (B) :).
Hi Chris,

Please help me understand the problem with A

Regards,
Vishal
Join the discussion

by goelmaya » Mon Mar 26, 2012 12:39 am
vishal.pathak wrote:
chris@magoosh wrote:The argument claims that humans, regardless of their respective culture, are born predisposed to certain musical intervals. The evidence: six-month old babies have a predilection for 4ths, 5ths, and octaves. We are looking to strengthen this claim.

One way of looking at a STRENGTHEN question is that we want an answer choice that "plugs up a hole" in the argument.

With our six-month babies, one could counter that the babies had already been exposed to music from their respective culture. After all, the prompt says that all music contains these intervals. So if babies have been exposed to music, then they've already developed a fondness for these intervals before the experiment.

Only (B) diffuses this objection by stating, "None of these babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture."

Therefore the answer is clearly (B) :).
Hi Chris,

Please help me understand the problem with A

Regards,
Vishal
Adults and grown up babies are out of scope.. IRRELEVANT
Join the discussion

by vishal.pathak » Mon Mar 26, 2012 1:17 am
goelmaya wrote:
vishal.pathak wrote:
chris@magoosh wrote:The argument claims that humans, regardless of their respective culture, are born predisposed to certain musical intervals. The evidence: six-month old babies have a predilection for 4ths, 5ths, and octaves. We are looking to strengthen this claim.

One way of looking at a STRENGTHEN question is that we want an answer choice that "plugs up a hole" in the argument.

With our six-month babies, one could counter that the babies had already been exposed to music from their respective culture. After all, the prompt says that all music contains these intervals. So if babies have been exposed to music, then they've already developed a fondness for these intervals before the experiment.

Only (B) diffuses this objection by stating, "None of these babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture."

Therefore the answer is clearly (B) :).
Hi Chris,

Please help me understand the problem with A

Regards,
Vishal
Adults and grown up babies are out of scope.. IRRELEVANT
No they are not. Stimulus says that test was done on babies and the response was positive. It then claims that humans probably have a biological predisposition to pay more attention to those intervals than to others.

There is a logic gap between premise and conclusion. Test was conducted on a smaller group(Babies) and the result is applied to a larger group (Humans). Option A fills this logic gap by saying that the other part of the larger group also has a general tendency to pay more attention to octaves, fifths, and fourths than to other musical intervals.
Join the discussion

by tanviet » Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:23 am
PRETHINKING: experiment with baby is correct for all human
look for similar thing: A matchs

A is clearly a strengthener.

we have 2 strengthener inhere, A and B.
Join the discussion

by GMAT Kolaveri » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:47 am
goelmaya wrote:
vishal.pathak wrote:
chris@magoosh wrote:The argument claims that humans, regardless of their respective culture, are born predisposed to certain musical intervals. The evidence: six-month old babies have a predilection for 4ths, 5ths, and octaves. We are looking to strengthen this claim.

One way of looking at a STRENGTHEN question is that we want an answer choice that "plugs up a hole" in the argument.

With our six-month babies, one could counter that the babies had already been exposed to music from their respective culture. After all, the prompt says that all music contains these intervals. So if babies have been exposed to music, then they've already developed a fondness for these intervals before the experiment.

Only (B) diffuses this objection by stating, "None of these babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture."

Therefore the answer is clearly (B) :).
Hi Chris,

Please help me understand the problem with A

Regards,
Vishal
Adults and grown up babies are out of scope.. IRRELEVANT
It says about humans..it is very much relevant
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

Click the thank you button if you like my reply :)
Join the discussion

by GMAT Kolaveri » Tue Mar 27, 2012 6:53 am
GmatKiss wrote:In an experiment, researchers played a series of musical intervals - two-note sequences - to a large diverse group of six-month old babies. They found that the babies paid significantly more attention when the intervals were perfect octaves, fifths, or fourths than otherwise. These intervals are prevalent in the musical systems of most cultures around the world. Thus, humans probably have a biological predisposition to pay more attention to those intervals than to others.

Which one of the following, if true most strengthens the argument?

A) Several similar experiments using older children and adults found that these subjects, too, had a general tendency to pay more attention to octaves, fifths, and fourths than to other musical intervals.

B) None of the babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture.

C) All of the babies in the experiment had been exposed to music drawn equally from a wide variety of cultures around the world.

D) In a second experiment, these same babies showed no clear tendency to notice primary colors more than other colors.

E) Octaves, fifths, and fourths were played more frequently during the experiment than other musical intervals were.

IMO: B

Clearly A is the correct option.
Premise talks about the results of an experiment whole sample set is 6-month old babies
Conclusion talks about humans (babies, older babies and adults).

As far as i know the only way you can strengthen this jump from babies to humans is by saying that same results were observed with Humans (adults and older babies).
Regards and Thanks,
Vinoth@GMAT Kolaveri
https://www.facebook.com/GmatKolaveri
https://gmatkolaveri.tumblr.com/

Click the thank you button if you like my reply :)
Join the discussion

by Gaurav 2013-fall » Thu May 10, 2012 12:46 am
IMO A whats the OA?
Join the discussion

by agarwalva » Mon May 14, 2012 3:46 pm
A biological predisposition -- in the context of psychology -- indicates that a person, because of his/her genetic makeup, is more prone to the development of certain symptoms ...

In an experiment, researchers played a series of musical intervals - two-note sequences - to a large diverse group of six-month old babies. They found that the babies paid significantly more attention when the intervals were perfect octaves, fifths, or fourths than otherwise. These intervals are prevalent in the musical systems of most cultures around the world. Thus, humans probably have a biological predisposition to pay more attention to those intervals than to others.

Which one of the following, if true most strengthens the argument?

A) Several similar experiments using older children and adults found that these subjects, too, had a general tendency to pay more attention to octaves, fifths, and fourths than to other musical intervals.

B) None of the babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any cultur
Conclusion - humans probably have a biological predisposition (inclination) to pay more attention to those intervals (perfect octaves, fifths, or fourths ) than to others

Assumption - The babies weren't used to this kind of music before


A) Several similar experiments using older children and adults found that these subjects, too, had a general tendency to pay more attention to octaves, fifths, and fourths than to other musical intervals.
>> what if the adults and older children have been listening to this kind of music and hence they pay more attention.

B) None of the babies in the experiment had previous exposure to music from any culture
>> this shows that humans have biological predisposition
IMO B
Join the discussion

by karthikyethu » Mon May 14, 2012 10:37 pm
why not C ?

because the babies were exposed to a wide variety of music, but still had a predisposition to certain intervals...
Join the discussion